Downstream Effects of Urbanization on Stillwater Creek, Oklahoma

Abstract

Geomorphic effects of urbanization vary according to local conditions and with different ecoregions. This project evaluates the effects of urbanization on Stillwater Creek, located in central Oklahoma. The upper section of this basin is predominantly rural, while the downstream section is experiencing urban expansion. It was hypothesized that the channel morphology of the lower section would differ significantly from that of the upper section due to the location of the confluence of Boomer Creek, which brings urban runoff from the city of Stillwater. Statistical analysis of downstream trends revealed no significant change in the majority of response variables between upstream and downstream sections. However, local conditions (i.e,. riparian trees, cohesive bank materials, occasional woody debris jams, and entrenched nature) in this basin counter the possible effects of urbanization on channel morphology. Increasing urbanization was expected to reduce the sources of woody debris to stream channel and affect channel morphology. However, Stillwater Creek had thick riparian corridors dominated by trees, which helped protect stream banks. A downstream parabolic channel cross-sectional shape also helped explain why this stream channel did not change radically due to urbanization. [

Coupled fish-hydrogeomorphic responses to urbanization in streams of Columbus, Ohio, USA

“…Multiple local-scale landscape factors, including local geology [87,88], sediment regimes [23,89,90], and riparian vegetation [91,92] may influence the type and rate of channel response to development. Acknowledging these and other variables, Booth and Fischenich [93] provided an updated channel evolution model (CEM) specifically for urban streams, considering channel type (alluvial vs. non-alluvial; single-thread vs. braided), valley morphology, channel confinement (anthropogenic or natural), and anthropogenic activities impacting fluvial geomorphic responses.…”

Geomorphic Effects of Mosses in a Low-Order Stream in Fairfax County, Virginia

“…Thompson Creek was divided into 30 reaches according to tributary confluences and sinuosity (Kang and Marston, 2006;Kang et al, 2010). A bank erosion study site was identified near the upstream portion of each reach (Fig.…”

“…Local vegetation communities play an important role in geomorphic processes operating on stream banks (Montgomery, 1997;Simon et al, 2004;Trimble, 2004;Gurnell et al, 2006;Kang et al, 2010). The presence of riparian vegetation adds roughness elements to stream banks and bed, reduces the stream power, controls stream bank temperature, moderates the rates of evapotranspiration, and provides stability to stream banks.…”

Ecological Impacts of Altered Stream Hydrogeomorphic Characteristics Extend Beyond the Channel Boundary: Evidence From Urban Streams of Columbus, OH, United States

“…Riparian landscape characteristics play a critical role in the magnitude of channel response to urban flow regimes (Finkenbine et al, 2000;Bledsoe and Watson, 2001;Kang et al, 2010). Flow regime can influence the density, rate, and composition of aquatic-to-terrestrial subsidies: high-scour floods result in low periphyton standing stocks and filterer-dominated macroinvertebrate assemblages, whereas lower-scour areas tend to have more abundant periphyton and a shift to a predominance of collector-gatherers and scrapers (Fuller et al, 2010).…”