2015
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1009817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downstream processing and chromatography based analytical methods for production of vaccines, gene therapy vectors, and bacteriophages

Abstract: Downstream processing of nanoplexes (viruses, virus-like particles, bacteriophages) is characterized by complexity of the starting material, number of purification methods to choose from, regulations that are setting the frame for the final product and analytical methods for upstream and downstream monitoring. This review gives an overview on the nanoplex downstream challenges and chromatography based analytical methods for efficient monitoring of the nanoplex production.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At low ligand density the LP4 fraction contained a ratio of 4.59 VP/IVP, MP5 had 5.12, and HP6 4.00 VP/ IVP all are within accepted ranges for clinical use(Kramberger et al, 2015) and despite the different ligand densities presenting unique elution profiles with product eluting at different conductivities, the highest titre peaks (LP4, MP5, and HP6) showed a relatively consistent infective ratio. The ratio of viral particles to infective viral particles or units (VP/IVP) is often used as an indicator of product quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At low ligand density the LP4 fraction contained a ratio of 4.59 VP/IVP, MP5 had 5.12, and HP6 4.00 VP/ IVP all are within accepted ranges for clinical use(Kramberger et al, 2015) and despite the different ligand densities presenting unique elution profiles with product eluting at different conductivities, the highest titre peaks (LP4, MP5, and HP6) showed a relatively consistent infective ratio. The ratio of viral particles to infective viral particles or units (VP/IVP) is often used as an indicator of product quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Monoliths have been applied to Ad5 purification (Whitfield, Battom, Barut, Gilham, & Ball, 2009) as well as the separation of much larger enveloped virus species including Vaccinia viruses (350 nm; Vincent et al, 2017). The final infective coefficient of virus particle per infective virus particles (VP/IVP) was 13, a range documented as acceptable for potency by the Food and Drug Administration (Kramberger, Urbas, & Štrancar, 2015). Previous reports showed that the CIM™ QA-1 was preferable over the weak anion CIM™ DEAE-1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of brevity, a discussion of downstream processing was omitted. Please refer to the following articles for further downstream processing information: [56][57][58].…”
Section: Manufacturing and Engineering Dna Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with filtration procedures, (liquid) chromatography technologies are now widely used to reduce viral contamination of biological/biopharmaceutical products such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) [12] and blood products [3]. They have also become a major step in bioseparation schemes for the recovery/purification of viruses or virus-like particles, with a view to large-scale production of high-purity viral stocks needed for manufacture of safer vaccines and viral vectors for gene therapy [13,14]. In the search for improved tools against viral contamination and infections, chromatographic adsorbents based on PS -agarose (AG) and CEL, essentially, and dextran, to a lesser extent (Table 1) -have proven to be materials of choice for virus purification and virus removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%