2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doxastic Group Reasoning via Multiple Belief Shadowing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is intended to mean that the value of ∼q is hypothesized to be true and the value of ∼p is hypothesized to be false. Hence, (22) results in {p}, confirming the hypotheses. On the other hand, consider:…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is intended to mean that the value of ∼q is hypothesized to be true and the value of ∼p is hypothesized to be false. Hence, (22) results in {p}, confirming the hypotheses. On the other hand, consider:…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…While the ontology may be huge, the inconsistency affects only literals involving ns(.). Some Further Use-Cases Due to a limited space let us only indicate some further use cases being directly relevant to the current paper: 3 actions in potentially inconsistent/incomplete environments [14]; belief fusion and shadowing [13,22]; argumentation [23,24]; approximate reasoning [59].…”
Section: Selected Use-casesmentioning
confidence: 99%