1982
DOI: 10.1097/00000421-198205050-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doxorubicin plus VP-16-213 for the treatment of refractory breast carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also applied very strict criteria for dose reduction in these patients, leading to dose reduction in the majority of them. These factors might be in part responsible for the relatively lower response rate observed in this study with respect to other com binations containing doxorubicin [2,3], The 42% re sponse rate observed with this combination chemo therapy, however, is similar to that obtained by other authors [18,19]. Whether doxorubicin alone can ob tain the same results as the combination should be answered by a randomized trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also applied very strict criteria for dose reduction in these patients, leading to dose reduction in the majority of them. These factors might be in part responsible for the relatively lower response rate observed in this study with respect to other com binations containing doxorubicin [2,3], The 42% re sponse rate observed with this combination chemo therapy, however, is similar to that obtained by other authors [18,19]. Whether doxorubicin alone can ob tain the same results as the combination should be answered by a randomized trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We employed doxorubicin in combination with VP 16, based on some prior encouraging experiences, reporting 13-40% response rates in patients variously pretreated [18][19][20]. We entered only patients without prior chemotherapy or with mild pretreatment (31% of patients were pretreated with CMF for metastatic disease); moreover, we studied only patients who had measurable disease, in order to avoid unclear efficacy assessment due to poor evaluability of some lesions (e. g. bone involvement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation