2016 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ict.2016.7500387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DPDK Open vSwitch performance validation with mirroring feature

Abstract: International audienceNetwork Function Visualization (NFV) and Software Defined Network (SDN) currently play a key role to transform the network architecture from hardware-based to software-based. Along with cloud computing, NFV and SDN are moving network functions from dedicated hardware to software implementation (Virtual Network Functions - VNF), on Virtual Machine (VM) or other virtualization technology such as containers, on top of a virtualized platform in the Cloud. To connect the VNFs, hosted in the sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As future work, we plan to extend this framework by supporting OVS‐DPDK. Many studies have shown that the performance of OVS increases when DPDK is used as a userspace datapath 36 . Our tool would be more versatile if it could evaluate the performance of an SDN network, where many types of datapaths (kernel, userspace, and hardware) are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As future work, we plan to extend this framework by supporting OVS‐DPDK. Many studies have shown that the performance of OVS increases when DPDK is used as a userspace datapath 36 . Our tool would be more versatile if it could evaluate the performance of an SDN network, where many types of datapaths (kernel, userspace, and hardware) are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He et al [14] evaluate a software switch bandwidth slicing mechanism; however, their tests were performed in simple scenarios and their results are presented without a thorough analysis of the latency values. The same shortcoming is exhibited in [10]- [13] in terms of latency evaluation: their models of packet latency are for simple, synthetic testing scenarios. The latency of a single flow has been evaluated in [10]- [12], while [13] only evaluates the latency of a single packet.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The userspace implementation of the forwarding datapath called ovs-switchd and the datapath kernel module written specifically for the host operating system to achieve high performance [29]. The performance of the Open vSwitch kernel datapath reaches up to 800 Mbit/s [30] on a single UDP flow tested, which can be further enhanced by using a different datapath, e.g., DPDK (Data Plane Development Kit) [31] or a hardware implementation. We modified the Open vSwitch open source software implemented forwarder, which currently handles OpenFlow up to version 1.5.…”
Section: Forwarder Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%