2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Draft Genome Assembly for the Tibetan Black Bear (Ursus thibetanus thibetanus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, inconsistencies with previous estimates of total N e across species appear to be attributable to differences in the selected mutation rate. Here, we predict a nearly doubled N e compared to previous results (Cahill et al 2013; Kumar et al 2017; Endo et al 2021; Zhu et al 2020; Liu et al 2014; Lan et al 2022), which is consistent with expectations for having a mutation rate that is approximately halved (Nadachowska-Brzyska et al 2016). This mutation rate is likely more accurate since it was calculated directly through trio sequencing (Wang et al 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, inconsistencies with previous estimates of total N e across species appear to be attributable to differences in the selected mutation rate. Here, we predict a nearly doubled N e compared to previous results (Cahill et al 2013; Kumar et al 2017; Endo et al 2021; Zhu et al 2020; Liu et al 2014; Lan et al 2022), which is consistent with expectations for having a mutation rate that is approximately halved (Nadachowska-Brzyska et al 2016). This mutation rate is likely more accurate since it was calculated directly through trio sequencing (Wang et al 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Across most repetitive element classes, a majority of the bears had comparable numbers, but differed most substantially in the total amount of 'Small RNA', 'Unclassified', and 'Other' (comprising satellites, simple repeats, and low complexity regions) (Figure 1b). Consistent with previous results, we found that long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) represented the largest percentage of repetitive elements in the Ursidae family (Zhu et al 2020;Srivastava et al 2019), however, one study reported fewer total repeats in the American black bear (Ursus americanus) and a greater number of repeats overall in the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) (Srivastava et al 2019). Interestingly, while most Ursid species contain a relatively low percent of small RNA repetitive elements, we find expansions of this repetitive element class in the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) and the Japanese black bear (Ursus thibetanus japonicus) (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Repetitive Contentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, inconsistencies with previous estimates of total N e across species appear to be attributable to differences in the selected mutation rate. Here, we predict a nearly doubled N e compared to previous results ( Cahill et al 2013 ; Liu et al 2014 ; Kumar et al 2017 ; Zhu et al 2020 ; Endo et al 2021 ; Lan et al 2022 ), which is consistent with expectations for having a mutation rate that is approximately halved ( Nadachowska-Brzyska et al 2016 ). This mutation rate is likely more accurate since it was calculated directly through trio sequencing (Wang et al 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1 B ). Consistent with previous results, we found that long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) represented the largest percentage of repetitive elements in the Ursidae family ( Srivastava et al 2019 ; Zhu et al 2020 ), however, one study reported fewer total repeats in the American black bear ( Ursus americanus ) and a greater number of repeats overall in the giant panda ( Ailuropoda melanoleuca ) ( Srivastava et al 2019 ). Interestingly, while most Ursid species contain a relatively low percent of small RNA repetitive elements, we find expansions of this repetitive element class in the Andean bear ( Tremarctos ornatus ) and the Japanese black bear ( Ursus thibetanus japonicus ) ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Heterozygous sites were extracted by performing Samtools (v1.3.1, Li et al. 2009 ) with the parameters “mpileup -q 20 -Q 20.” Finally, the PSMC model ( Li and Durbin 2011 ) was analyzed using the parameters -N25 -t15 -r5 -b -p “4þ25*2þ4þ6.” ( ZHu et al. 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%