2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Draft genome sequence and nomenclature adjustment of Rhodococcus qingshengii CS98, a cesium-accumulating strain isolated in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cesium-accumulating bacterium Rhodococcus erythropolis CS98 was isolated from soil in Japan ( 1 , 2 ) as a promising strain for bioremediation purposes. Recently, this strain was reclassified as Rhodococcus qingshengii CS98 on the basis of the results of the average nucleotide identity analysis, and its draft genome has been reported ( 3 ).…”
Section: Announcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cesium-accumulating bacterium Rhodococcus erythropolis CS98 was isolated from soil in Japan ( 1 , 2 ) as a promising strain for bioremediation purposes. Recently, this strain was reclassified as Rhodococcus qingshengii CS98 on the basis of the results of the average nucleotide identity analysis, and its draft genome has been reported ( 3 ).…”
Section: Announcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genome was automatically annotated with the DFAST pipeline (8), which predicted a total of 6,255 protein-coding sequences, 59 tRNAs, and 5 rRNA (5S, 16S, and 23S rRNA) operons. Comparative analysis using Mauve v.2.4.0 (9) showed that the genome was almost identical with the previous draft genome (3) and complemented gaps between contigs. BLAST v.2.11.0 (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) analysis revealed that the chromosome sequence had similarities to chromosomes of R. qingshengii strains djl-6-2 (GenBank accession number CP025959) and RL1 (GenBank accession number CP042917) (identities of 99.07% and 99.09% and query coverages of 96% and 95%, respectively).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%