1998
DOI: 10.13031/2013.19392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Draft of Primary Tillage Implements in Sandy Loam Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation coefficient and prediction accuracy for the linear regression model were 0.592 and 61%, respectively, which were significantly lower than the correlation coefficient and prediction accuracy of the ANN model, which were 0.9445 and 89%, respectively. The results are in agreement with those obtained by Al-Janobi and Al-Suhaibani (1998) and Alimardani et al (2009) [4,13]. Equation 6 where F is the draft force (Kgf); D is the working depth (cm); R is the moisture content; C is the soil cone index (MPa); and S is the forward speed (km/h).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ann Model With the Linear Regression Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The correlation coefficient and prediction accuracy for the linear regression model were 0.592 and 61%, respectively, which were significantly lower than the correlation coefficient and prediction accuracy of the ANN model, which were 0.9445 and 89%, respectively. The results are in agreement with those obtained by Al-Janobi and Al-Suhaibani (1998) and Alimardani et al (2009) [4,13]. Equation 6 where F is the draft force (Kgf); D is the working depth (cm); R is the moisture content; C is the soil cone index (MPa); and S is the forward speed (km/h).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ann Model With the Linear Regression Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The hall effect sensors that would detect magnets were fixed to the apparatus mounted on the tractor (Fig. 1) [21,22,32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combined tillage tool simultaneously uses two or more types of tillage implement to accomplish primary and secondary tillage in a one-pass operation for seedbed preparation (Prem et al., 2016). The potential benefits of combining a passive implement as a primary implement and an active implement as a secondary tillage implement are:Reduction in the number of tillage operations which can reduce sub-soil compaction (Manian et al., 1999), the time of field operation, and fuel and labor costs (Al-Janobi and Al-Suhaibani, 1998; Sahu and Raheman, 2006; Kailappan et al., 2001). Reduction in the draft force due to the soil cutting of the active tool providing some thrust force (Shinners et al., 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction in the number of tillage operations which can reduce sub-soil compaction (Manian et al., 1999), the time of field operation, and fuel and labor costs (Al-Janobi and Al-Suhaibani, 1998; Sahu and Raheman, 2006; Kailappan et al., 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%