1986
DOI: 10.13031/2013.30097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Draft Relationships for Primary Tillage in Oklahoma Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Michel et al, (1985) reported that proper selection of an efficient tool, such as chisel ploughshare rather than mouldboard plough, can cut down the tillage energy requirements up to 40%. Studies on influence of tractor speed and tillage depth were conducted by many researchers (ASAE., 1993; Khushwaha and Linke., 1996; Summers et al, 1986). Furthermore, Al-Jonabi and Al-Suhaibani (1998) developed the general equation for primary tillage tools (Mouldboard plough, three chisel ploughs of different shanks, disc plough and an offset disc harrow).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Michel et al, (1985) reported that proper selection of an efficient tool, such as chisel ploughshare rather than mouldboard plough, can cut down the tillage energy requirements up to 40%. Studies on influence of tractor speed and tillage depth were conducted by many researchers (ASAE., 1993; Khushwaha and Linke., 1996; Summers et al, 1986). Furthermore, Al-Jonabi and Al-Suhaibani (1998) developed the general equation for primary tillage tools (Mouldboard plough, three chisel ploughs of different shanks, disc plough and an offset disc harrow).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference can be attributed to the different field conditions and the type of tillage tool used in the studies. Owen (1989) found that draught force increase is a quadratic function of velocity; however, Summers et al (1986) reported a linear relationship between them. Figure 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1976, 40) haben, wie auch in der neueren Publikation von Summers u. Mitarb. (1987,38) es als essentiell angesehen, das Radiusköpfchen zusätzlich zu resezieren. Es besteht kein Zweifel, daß das destruierte Radiusköpfchen die Umwendbeweglichkeit stört und bei Instabilität (Subluxation des Radiusköpfchens, Anspannen des Bizeps gegen Widerstand in 90 o -EB-Flexion) wird die Flexion beeinträchtigt.…”
Section: J)iskllssiollunclassified