2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drag and heat transfer closures for realistic numerically generated random open-cell solid foams using an immersed boundary method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, for commercial foams, cell sizes in the range [0.5-5 mm], porosities in the range of [0.75-0.9] for ceramic substrates [0.85-0.96] for metallic substrates and surface to volume ratios in the range [300-5,000 m −1 ] have been reported. As already reported for honeycombs, a high surface area of the support promotes gas/solid heat and mass transport, at the expenses of pressure drops (Das et al, 2018).…”
Section: Open Cell Foamssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Generally, for commercial foams, cell sizes in the range [0.5-5 mm], porosities in the range of [0.75-0.9] for ceramic substrates [0.85-0.96] for metallic substrates and surface to volume ratios in the range [300-5,000 m −1 ] have been reported. As already reported for honeycombs, a high surface area of the support promotes gas/solid heat and mass transport, at the expenses of pressure drops (Das et al, 2018).…”
Section: Open Cell Foamssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…于分析界面耦合条件 [12,23,24] 、Weaire-Phelan结构 [25] 、基于LVT方法生 成的结构 [19] 和以表面能最小为目标演化得到的随机 结构 [20] . 后两种结构具有随机性, 更接近真实的泡沫…”
Section: 公开文献中 对复合结构的模拟研究有限 其主要集中unclassified
“…The numerical simulation can quantitatively analyse the interaction behaviours, including heat transfer, drag and deformation, which induce an exchange of momentum and energy between the shocked air and the porous foam. Although some studies conducted a direct numerical simulation considering the random microstructure of a foam (Wehinger, Heitmann & Kraume 2016;Das et al 2018), it is computationally expensive to discuss the propagation and the mitigation of the blast wave that propagates for approximately 1 m for the laboratory scale and 1 km for the real scale. A realistic solution for discussing the blast wave/porous foam interaction is a multiphase macroscopic approach that determines the averaged quantities of mass, momentum and energy for both gas and porous foam phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%