2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drag reduction mechanism induced by a combinational opposing jet and spike concept in supersonic flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spike geometric parameters such as spike length, aerodisk geometry, forward body geometry and relative spike diameter were studied for drag reduction effect [19][20] [21]. Some researchers [22][23] [24] investigated the aerodynamic characteristics of conical, hemispherical, flat-faced aerospike, and hemispherical and flat-faced disk attached to the aerospike, and they found that the aerodisk spike has a superior drag reduction capability as compared to the other aerospikes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spike geometric parameters such as spike length, aerodisk geometry, forward body geometry and relative spike diameter were studied for drag reduction effect [19][20] [21]. Some researchers [22][23] [24] investigated the aerodynamic characteristics of conical, hemispherical, flat-faced aerospike, and hemispherical and flat-faced disk attached to the aerospike, and they found that the aerodisk spike has a superior drag reduction capability as compared to the other aerospikes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same work was replicated numerically by Qu et al [312] whereas Pish et al [313] reported the same conclusions in their numerical study on different jet settings. Contradicting conclusions were reported by Huang et al [314] in their numerical simulation studies. By varying the spike length and tip jet pressure ratio, a maximum drag reduction was not achieved by maximizing both spike length and jet pressure.…”
Section: Structural-fluidic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For brevity, the code validation, as well as its grid independency analysis, is omitted, and the researchers can refer to our previous publications, i.e., Ref. [37]. The convergence history for all the residuals during the numerical simulation process is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%