2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-016-9647-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dragons, Ladybugs, and Softballs: Girls’ STEM Engagement with Human-Centered Robotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the first issue, we have a total of 210 authors. The most relevant ones (the authors with more than one paper in the selected group) were Eguchi [36,37] and Gomoll et al [48,49]. On the basis of the top 10 authors by Scopus and Google Scholar H‐index, the results can be found in Table 3.…”
Section: Data Results and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the first issue, we have a total of 210 authors. The most relevant ones (the authors with more than one paper in the selected group) were Eguchi [36,37] and Gomoll et al [48,49]. On the basis of the top 10 authors by Scopus and Google Scholar H‐index, the results can be found in Table 3.…”
Section: Data Results and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruf, Mühling, & Hubwiese (2014) Scratch vs. Karel-Impact on learning outcomes and motivation Ruiz-del-Solar & Avilés (2004) Robotics courses for children as a motivation tool: The chilean experience Rusak, & Lim (2014) Come code with codester: An educational app that teaches computer science to K-6 students Ryder, Pegg, & Wood 2012A project-based engineering and leadership workshop for high school students Seals, & Smith (2013) Enhancing K-12 education with engineering outreach Diversifying high school students' views about computing with electronic textiles Sentance, & Schwiderski-Grosche (2012) Challenge and creativity: Using .NET gadgeteer in schools Shanahan, & Marghitu (2013) Software engineering Java curriculum with Alice and cloud computing Weaving a tapestry: Creating a satellite workshop to support HS CS teachers in attracting and engaging students Smith, Sutcliffe, & Sandvik (2014) Code club: Bringing programming to UK primary schools through scratch Stansbury, & Behi (2012) Inspiring interest in STEM through summer robotics camp Sullivan, & Wilson (2015) Playful talk: Negotiating opportunities to learn in collaborative groups Taban, Acar, Ismailm Ayhan (2005) Teaching basic engineering concepts in K-12 environment using LEGO bricks and robotics Tatsumi, Nakano, Tajitsu, Okumura, & Harada (2009) Incorporating music into the study of algorithms and computer programming Terry, Briggs, & Rivale (2011) Work in progress: Gender impacts of relevant robotics curricula on high school students' engineering attitudes and interest van Delden, & Yang 2014Robotics summer camps as a recruiting tool: A case study Wagner, Gray, Corley, & Wolber (2013) Using app inventor in a K-12 summer camp Welch, & Huffman (2011) The effect of robotics competitions on high school students' attitudes toward science Werner, Denner, Bliesner, & Rex (2009) Can middle-schoolers use storytelling Alice to make games? Results of a pilot study Starting from scratch: Experimenting with computer science in Flemish secondary education Ziaeefard, Page, Knop, Ribeiro, Miller, Rastgaar, & Mahmoudian (2017) GUPPIE program-A hands-on STEM learning experience for middle school students Measuring the effectiveness of robotics activities in underserved K-12 communities outside the classroom Erickson-Ludwig 2015A college lead informal learning engineering education program for school-aged youth Frye, Nair, & Meyer (2016) Evaluation of minigems 2015-Engineering summer camp for middle school girls Gomoll, Hmelo-Silver, Š abanović...…”
Section: Creativity and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in the latter fields, particularly in educational technology research, has been advocating a move away from 'victory narratives' of technology towards a focus on pedagogies aligned with specific teaching-learning processes and contexts (Hennessy, Girvan, Mavrikis, Price, & Winters, 2018). Indeed, a few studies have investigated pedagogical strategies in robotics education, such as the 4C/ID framework (Noh & Lee, 2020), guided inquiry (Chambers, Carbonaro, & Murray, 2008), or problem-based approach (Gomoll, Hmelo-Silver, Šabanovi c, & Francisco, 2016). Yet as observed by Xia and Zhong (2018) in their systematic review, existing pedagogies adopted in robotics education have largely failed in originality.…”
Section: Robotics In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%