2016
DOI: 10.3329/bjms.v15i3.30202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drainage of Masseteric Abscess via Sublabial Approach: A Case Series

Abstract: Abstract:Masseteric abscesses are usually drained through the external or trans-oral approach. Both choices have their own risks and benefits. We included in our case series 3 patients whom presented with painful facial swelling and were diagnosed as masseteric abscess. We performed the sublabial approach to drain the collection. Post-operatively, they recovered well and there were no recurrences. This technique and outcome of surgery are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-oral sublabial approach to drain the abscess collection was reported, by making the incision at the upper gingival-buccal sulcus then dissecting to the space with the artery forceps. 6 This approach also gained good post-operative outcome faster and able to avoid complications suchas neurovascular injury. Other than open surgical approach, treatment modalities of submasseteric abscess is currently widened to ultrasound-guided aspiration of the abscess as reported in few literature with good outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Intra-oral sublabial approach to drain the abscess collection was reported, by making the incision at the upper gingival-buccal sulcus then dissecting to the space with the artery forceps. 6 This approach also gained good post-operative outcome faster and able to avoid complications suchas neurovascular injury. Other than open surgical approach, treatment modalities of submasseteric abscess is currently widened to ultrasound-guided aspiration of the abscess as reported in few literature with good outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%