2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drained Capacity of a Suction Caisson in Sand under Inclined Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For dense sand (D r = 100%) used in the centrifugal test [12], Young's modulus E and the peak internal friction angle ϕ p are taken from the literature [49] after being obtained from triaxial tests; that is, E = 658 p a (σ 3 /p a ) 0.469 and ϕ p = 40.9-7.8l g (σ 3 /p a ), where p a is the standard atmospheric pressure (101.3 kPa) and σ 3 is the confining pressure and takes the value of gravity stress γ'H, kPa. The values of ϕ p herein are relatively close to those for dense uwa sand in the recent literature [50,51], and their difference is 1~2 • . The values of E and ϕ p for loose sand (D r = 30%) and medium dense sand (D r = 60%) were calculated proportionally based on the literature [52].…”
Section: Fem Modelsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For dense sand (D r = 100%) used in the centrifugal test [12], Young's modulus E and the peak internal friction angle ϕ p are taken from the literature [49] after being obtained from triaxial tests; that is, E = 658 p a (σ 3 /p a ) 0.469 and ϕ p = 40.9-7.8l g (σ 3 /p a ), where p a is the standard atmospheric pressure (101.3 kPa) and σ 3 is the confining pressure and takes the value of gravity stress γ'H, kPa. The values of ϕ p herein are relatively close to those for dense uwa sand in the recent literature [50,51], and their difference is 1~2 • . The values of E and ϕ p for loose sand (D r = 30%) and medium dense sand (D r = 60%) were calculated proportionally based on the literature [52].…”
Section: Fem Modelsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Compared with field tests and laboratory experiments, numerical simulations have become the predominant method for investigating the dynamic responses of the seabed around suction caissons. In recent years, the finite element method (FEM) has been widely utilized for the study of soil behavior in the vicinity of suction anchors [23][24][25][26]. Specifically, Fu et al [25] utilized ABAQUS finite element analysis software to assess the impact of tension gaps on the holding capacity of suction anchors in offshore settings, focusing on determining optimal padeye positions and offering practical design strategies to address these gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%