2013
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dramatic changes in a phytoplankton community in response to local and global pressures: a 24‐year survey of the river Loire (France)

Abstract: The impact of climate change and of other anthropogenic pressures on the structure and composition of phytoplankton communities of large European rivers remains poorly documented. Here we report the findings of a study of the changes in the phytoplankton community of the middle segment of the river Loire over the past 24 years. An attempt is made to distinguish between the impact of changes acting at the local scale and that of those acting more globally. A dramatic reduction in phytoplankton abundance was obs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
3
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides physical reasons explained, this regional summer occurrence of low N:P ratio might be indicative for the whole section, being either explanatory or a consequence for the potamoplankton composition (Xie et al, 2003). The very distinct location of this low N:P ratio seems to delimit cyanobacterial blooms exceptionally in this upper Loire section, might be providing only the possibility for downstream transport, in contrast to recent findings at the middle Loire (Larroudé et al, 2013).…”
Section: Functional River Zones Along Nutrient Ratio Gradientscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Besides physical reasons explained, this regional summer occurrence of low N:P ratio might be indicative for the whole section, being either explanatory or a consequence for the potamoplankton composition (Xie et al, 2003). The very distinct location of this low N:P ratio seems to delimit cyanobacterial blooms exceptionally in this upper Loire section, might be providing only the possibility for downstream transport, in contrast to recent findings at the middle Loire (Larroudé et al, 2013).…”
Section: Functional River Zones Along Nutrient Ratio Gradientscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…However, other environmental changes are likely to have occurred locally over the same period and may also have contributed to the observed biological changes (Malmqvist & Rundle, 2002;Zajicek et al, 2018). Several studies demonstrated that improved water quality has ecological consequences for various organisms all along the trophic network, such as phytoplankton (Larroudé et al, 2013) and macroinvertebrates (Floury et al, 2013) in the Loire River or fish in various large rivers in the U.S.A. (Counihan et al, 2018) and probably also in France (Poulet et al, 2011). Several studies demonstrated that improved water quality has ecological consequences for various organisms all along the trophic network, such as phytoplankton (Larroudé et al, 2013) and macroinvertebrates (Floury et al, 2013) in the Loire River or fish in various large rivers in the U.S.A. (Counihan et al, 2018) and probably also in France (Poulet et al, 2011).…”
Section: Change In Species Composition and Poleward Shift Of Fish Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow and light intensity were identified as the key controls on bloom dynamics for agricultural streams in Illinois (Figueroa-Nieves et al, 2006) and the River Elbe, Germany (Hardenbicker et al, 2014). Other abiotic combinations that have been proposed include flow and water temperature (Desortova and Puncochar, 2011), flow, temperature and nutrient concentration (Larroude et al, 2013;van Vliet and Zwolsman, 2008), and flow, temperature and light (Balbi, 2000;Reynolds and Descy, 1996;Waylett et al, 2013). The impacts of invertebrate grazing (Lazar et al, 2012;Waylett et al, 2013;Whitehead et al, 2015), self-shading (Whitehead and Hornberger, 1984) and inhibition due to high light intensities (Whitehead et al, 1997) have also been postulated as a mechanism for limiting phytoplankton biomass and causing bloom cessation in modelling studies of the River Thames catchment, UK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%