“…Symonds announced that the Tudor moralities 'can hardly be said to lie in the direct line of evolution between the Miracle and the legitimate Drama, but rather to be an abortive side-effort, which was destined to bear barren fruit'. 2 Routinely dismissed as 'thematically humanistic, theatrically dull, and aesthetically mediocre', 3 early Tudor drama has, as Leah S. Marcus observes, typically 'interested scholars only as a transition to something else', 4 namely, the drama of Shakespeare and his immediate contemporaries. Frederick S. Boas' Introduction to Tudor Drama, for example, begins with the acknowledgment that Shakespeare 'does not stand alone in isolated majesty ', that His work is the climax, the consummation of the efforts and achievements of forerunners for a century before he began to write.…”