The notion that it is related to M. lepromatosis may be true according to some authors. However, others showed that the correlation is not that strong, looking at leprosy clinical types in different countries 6 ; M. lepromatosis may resemble M. leprae in causing different manifestations depending on the host immunity. 2 From the group around Rea and Modlin, Maria Achoa reported at the World Congress Dermatology in Milano that of their Mexican patients with lepra bonita, the majority was indeed infected with M. lepromatosis, while some had a single M. leprae infection or a mixed infection. Whether M. lepromatosis affects the internal organs more than M. leprae is yet to be proven. The difference in the type of infection may in part account for clinical and geographical variabilities associated with leprosy infection; however, according to our opinion, the survival of the bacilli in the environment and the socioeconomic factors are relatively more important. For the practising dermatologist, the bacilli causing leprosy are of academic interest only. The treatment is the same, and it is the resistance to therapy that counts. As far as the role of physical medicine is concerned, she is right, but to direct this requires publishing of another article.