1980
DOI: 10.1080/10570318009374017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dramaturgical theory and criticism: The state of the art (or science?)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis will be grounded in the general theoretical perspective of dramaturgy. Dramaturgy and dramaturgical are terms popularized by Gronbeck (1980) which are used to categorize various drama-oriented approaches to criticism (Brock et al, 1990). Similarly, Sillars (1991) Criticism is an activity whose procedures defy strict linearity.…”
Section: Critical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis will be grounded in the general theoretical perspective of dramaturgy. Dramaturgy and dramaturgical are terms popularized by Gronbeck (1980) which are used to categorize various drama-oriented approaches to criticism (Brock et al, 1990). Similarly, Sillars (1991) Criticism is an activity whose procedures defy strict linearity.…”
Section: Critical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of presenting the specific approach to dramaturgy attempted here, more complex issues arise. Dramaturgy, after an apparent surge in interest as a social science method in the 1970s and 1980s (Brissett and Edgley, 1975; Combs and Mansfield, 1976; Gronbeck, 1980; Lyman and Scott, 1975), has not become a dominant metaphor for organizational life. Indeed it was arguably not until the 1980s that it began to appear on a widespread basis in organizational analysis (Caldwell and O'Reilly, 1982; Gardner and Martinko, 1988; Mangham and Overington, 1982, 1987; Wood and Mitchell, 1981), but work appearing under its heading is ‘characterised by considerable confusion over the scope, application and utility of this perspective’ (Oswick et al.…”
Section: Background To the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gronbeck sounds like a social scientist when he claims that Burkean scholars try to generate "a systematic set of covering propositions." 4 Black argues that rhetorical theory, apart from the more insignificant theories derived from logical necessity, is grounded in "regularities" of psyche or discourse. 5 McGee explicitly claims that "if it is to achieve the status of 'theory,' any prose must reliably describe, explain, and predict."…”
Section: What Rhetorical Theory Is Notmentioning
confidence: 99%