2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DRAQ5 and Eosin (‘D&E’) as an Analog to Hematoxylin and Eosin for Rapid Fluorescence Histology of Fresh Tissues

Abstract: Real-time on-site histopathology review of biopsy tissues at the point-of-procedure has great potential for significant clinical value and improved patient care. For instance, on-site review can aid in rapid screening of diagnostic biopsies to reduce false-negative results, or in quantitative assessment of biospecimen quality to increase the efficacy of downstream laboratory and histopathology analysis. However, the only currently available rapid pathology method, frozen section analysis (FSA), is too time- an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, slide-free nondestructive microscopic pathology has the potential to conserve healthcare resources and to enable valuable specimens to be used for downstream molecular and genetic assays. Finally, note that our methods are compatible with current pathology standards, including the use of fast-acting fluorescence dyes (acridine orange, DRAQ5, eosin) and optical clearing, which have been shown to not interfere with downstream histology or assays [ 10 , 11 , 43 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, slide-free nondestructive microscopic pathology has the potential to conserve healthcare resources and to enable valuable specimens to be used for downstream molecular and genetic assays. Finally, note that our methods are compatible with current pathology standards, including the use of fast-acting fluorescence dyes (acridine orange, DRAQ5, eosin) and optical clearing, which have been shown to not interfere with downstream histology or assays [ 10 , 11 , 43 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Optical sectioning microscopy images a thin layer within an intact, thick specimen, greatly simplifying specimen preparation by forgoing physical sectioning. To date, various methods of histological imaging using optical sectioning microscopy have been proposed, including confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) 2 4 , two-photon excitation nonlinear microscopy (NLM) 5 7 , structured illumination microscopy (SIM) 8 , 9 , optical coherence tomography (OCT) 10 12 , and light sheet microscopy 13 . These techniques enable rapid evaluation of pathology with high correspondence to standard histological techniques 2 , 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because physical sectioning accounts for the vast majority of processing delay for both FFPE and FSA histology, optical sectioning can dramatically reduce processing times and enable intraoperative histological examination in scenarios where FFPE and FSA histology are too time consuming. Various methods have been proposed for imaging breast, prostate and other surgical margins without physical sectioning, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) [18][19][20][21][22], reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) [23,24], confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) [25][26][27][28][29], structured illumination microscopy (SIM) [30], light sheet microscopy [31], microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation (MUSE) [32,33], and nonlinear microscopy (NLM) [34][35][36][37][38]. Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) has also been demonstrated for surgical histology [39], but typically has appreciably lower imaging speed or signal to noise ratio when performed without physical sectioning in reflectance mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%