1986
DOI: 10.1021/bk-1986-0315.ch008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DRASTIC: A System to Evaluate the Pollution Potential of Hydrogeologic Settings by Pesticides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
1,384
0
162

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 791 publications
(1,549 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
1,384
0
162
Order By: Relevance
“…Aquifer contamination depends on several factors and conditions and can be predicted using models such as DRASTIC (Aller et al 1987). Such models assume that bioavailability depends on soil texture, hydrological conditions, hydrogeological settings, and climatic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquifer contamination depends on several factors and conditions and can be predicted using models such as DRASTIC (Aller et al 1987). Such models assume that bioavailability depends on soil texture, hydrological conditions, hydrogeological settings, and climatic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80 -100 representing Oke Agbe, Arigidi, Ogbagi, Irun, and part of Ikare are characteized by moderately deep water levels (greater than 5 m) around the north central part. Although the thickness of the vadose zone is an important consideration in vulnerability assessment [33][34], the composition of the soil media and the lithology/physical properties of materials capping the vadose zone also constitute important parameters in vulnerability assessment [35]. Clay or silt, characterized by low resistivity (1 -100 Ω-m) and very low permeability, and impervious or semi-impervious materials (laterite and lateritic sand), characterized by high resistivity values (>400 Ω-m) constitute protective layers where they cap vadose zones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the DRASTIC system by Aller et al 1987), where the weighting would be assigned based on the assigned importance number of the R factors, as indicated in Table 2, ranging from R = 1 to R = 3. However, development of such an expert system requires more analysis on whether or not to include other natural, mining, and technical factors.…”
Section: A Proposed Methods To Assess Water Hazards In Shaftsmentioning
confidence: 99%