“…Improved understanding at this level could potentially better inform theoretically motivated treatment approaches. The potential to identify therapyinduced areas of activation is encouraging based upon the studies conducted to date (e.g., Belin et al, 1996;Breier, Maher, Schmadeke, Hasan, & Papanicolaou, 2007;Cornelissen et al, 2003;Farias, Davis, & Harrington, 2006;Léger et al, 2002;Meinzer, Wienbruch, Djundja, Barthel, & Rockstroh, 2004;Musso et al, 1999;Pulvermüller, Hauk, Zohsel, Neininger, & Mohr, 2005;Richter, Miltner, & Straube, 2008;Small, Flores, & Noll, 1998;Wierenga et al, 2006). For example, Meinzer et al (2004), using magnetoencephalography (MEG), found evidence for changes in perilesional activity, which was correlated with the amount of change in language functions after treatment in a large group of patients with chronic aphasia.…”