2022
DOI: 10.1111/peps.12496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drawing the line: How the workplace shapes the naming of sexual harassment

Abstract: Although sexual harassment naming -the process by which individuals identify and label experiences as sexual harassment -is key to tackling the problem of workplace sexual harassment, extant research focused on individual differences has explained a limited amount of variance in individuals' propensity to name. We push this research in a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggest that general harassment triggers government employees to rethink their present careers. Our results corroborate several previous studies regarding general harassment (Chawla et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2014; Raver & Gelfand, 2005; Strom et al., 2022). In order for sustainable HRM to develop, it is essential that organisations have mechanisms to combat all kinds of harassment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings suggest that general harassment triggers government employees to rethink their present careers. Our results corroborate several previous studies regarding general harassment (Chawla et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2014; Raver & Gelfand, 2005; Strom et al., 2022). In order for sustainable HRM to develop, it is essential that organisations have mechanisms to combat all kinds of harassment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Likely, what was observed in this context concerning workplace bullying is also applicable to other types of workplace conflicts, such as sexual harassment: If there is room for different interpretations, actors with unitarist , pluralist or critical frames of reference might understand and react differently to what apparently is the same conflict. Future research could, for instance, evaluate the role of employees’ frames of reference in naming sexual harassment behaviour, explaining why the same harassment situations are interpreted differently by different workers (Strom et al., 2022). Moreover, the study reinforces the validity of the theory of mismatched frames of reference in employment relations by applying the theory developed by Budd et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will show how different understandings of bullying by employers and unions are linked to the different actors' frames of reference and how those mismatched frames also result in different conflict management strategies. While the idea that the same concepts or situations can have different meanings for different actors is not new in industrial relations (Bray et al, 2020;Strom et al, 2022), this article is the first to empirically analyse specific organizational responses to the same type of conflict using frames of reference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is often called a hostile sexual work environment [2,6,11,12], which involves sexual behavior that "has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment" [13] (p. 1). Sexual harassment does not belong in the workplace, and organizations should follow the law and proactively try to prevent it [14]. But could these needed laws also have unattended consequences?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%