1975
DOI: 10.1037/h0076652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dream deprivation and facilitation with hypnosis.

Abstract: We attempted to modify sleep and dreaming through the administration of various posthypnotic suggestions. Subjects were 17 male undergraduates who were selected for high susceptibility to hypnosis. After two adaptation nights, 5 subjects were given a dream-deprivation suggestion, 8 were given a suggestion of dream-facilitation, and the remaining 4 subjects were administered a neutral posthypnotic suggestion. Subjective dream reports were dramatically affected in the predicted directions. Electrophysiological c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stoyva implied that if a posthypnotic suggestion was effective and subjects did dream on assigned themes, there would be a reduction in REM time. In contrast to this, Albert and Boone (1975) noted reductions in %REM time for 2 out of 5 subjects given an unpleasant posthypnotic suggestion not to dream, but normal amounts of %REM were found in subjects presented a pleasant posthypnotic suggestion to dream as much as possible. Thus, it was not just compliance with the suggestion which elicited reductions in REM time, but rather topic pleasantness did appear to be a factor in these reductions.…”
Section: Rem Processescontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Stoyva implied that if a posthypnotic suggestion was effective and subjects did dream on assigned themes, there would be a reduction in REM time. In contrast to this, Albert and Boone (1975) noted reductions in %REM time for 2 out of 5 subjects given an unpleasant posthypnotic suggestion not to dream, but normal amounts of %REM were found in subjects presented a pleasant posthypnotic suggestion to dream as much as possible. Thus, it was not just compliance with the suggestion which elicited reductions in REM time, but rather topic pleasantness did appear to be a factor in these reductions.…”
Section: Rem Processescontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Certainly, in the study of Breger et al (1971) the subject Jackie, who did not hold to the sensitivity assumptions of the therapy group, had, in her dreams following the first and second therapy sessions, little emotion, and “a lack of regressive or childhood material” (p. 79), which was congruent with her waking beliefs. We must beware the ignoring of experimenter effects and subject expectations in our field of dream psychology, given the widespread popular theorizing and wishful-thinking about dreams and dream function (see Domhoff, 1985), as well as when subjects are specifically instructed to dream in a certain way (e.g., Albert & Boone, 1975; Belicki & Bowers, 1982; Walker & Johnson, 1974).…”
Section: Methodological Problems With Investigating Dream Problem-sol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes insomnia is due to the presence of a constant and compulsive idea in the sleeper's visualization. This idea is that sleep is impossible, and insomnia is measured through self-reports of the duration of time taken to enter sleep, the actual duration of sleep, the depth of sleep, and periods of interruption during sleep (Albert & Boone, 1975;Beck-Little & Weinrich, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%