2013
DOI: 10.24972/ijts.2013.32.1.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dreaming and Reality: A Neuroanthropological Account

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have seen that dreaming invites shamanism (or the shamanic principle), especially under conditions of psychological healing. Most peoples on the planet consider dreaming epistemologically real, not fiction or some “figment of the imagination” (Laughlin, 2013). As such, the prime directive of the brain—make sense of experience—inevitably kicks-in to produce an overarching explanatory framework which in turn renders experiences had during dreaming and other ASPs sensible and thus redundant (to be expected, commonplace).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have seen that dreaming invites shamanism (or the shamanic principle), especially under conditions of psychological healing. Most peoples on the planet consider dreaming epistemologically real, not fiction or some “figment of the imagination” (Laughlin, 2013). As such, the prime directive of the brain—make sense of experience—inevitably kicks-in to produce an overarching explanatory framework which in turn renders experiences had during dreaming and other ASPs sensible and thus redundant (to be expected, commonplace).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supernal dreams as a form of knowledge (gnosis) are not reducible to a content that is either objectively measurable or reproducible, nor can such dreams be induced, though spiritual practices may enhance a person's capacity to receive such dreams (Laughlin 2013). Mystics of many traditions have written on the topic of their personal spiritual experiences, usually in the context of their specific tradition (Irwin 2015;Marshall 2014), though nature mystics and more contemporary mystical accounts demonstrate a capacity for such experience as being transtraditional, and no longer rooted in classic mystical traditions (Kripal 2010).…”
Section: Mystical-ontological Dreamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their interpretation is no small challenge, since although a number of useful insights into sense of reality (SR) have emerged over the past decades (e.g. Aggernaes 1972, Johnson&Raye 1981, Bentall 1990, Ratcliffe 2008, Laughlin 2013, Farkas 2013, Hobson et al 2014, Dokic&Martin 2017, a truly comprehensive theory is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%