2020
DOI: 10.1002/sea2.12200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dreaming like a market: The hidden script of financial inclusion in China's P2P lending platforms

Abstract: In the past ten years, Chinese people of different social strata have swarmed into the peer‐to‐peer (P2P) lending industry as lenders and borrowers. Meanwhile, stories have circulated across the media about desperate investors who lost their life savings on these lending platforms, many of which turned out to be Ponzi schemes. Based on fifteen months of fieldwork, this article presents a failed yet influential social experiment of digital finance in the world's largest developing economy. This article examines… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice to abandon the “internet” metaphor is related to the association in China of the “internet” with risky “private capital” during the past five or more years. “Internet Plus” policies opened up “leeway for private cyber giants to influence, if not hijack, the state’s agenda” (Hong, 2017, p. 5), causing alarming issues such as youth gaming-addiction (Rao, 2019), Ponzi schemes and over-indebtedness (Rao, 2020; Rao & McDonald, 2023), and national data security weakness (Ye, 2021). In 2021, China strengthened its control over the rapid expansion of “disorderly internet capitals” that were suspected of “monopolizing” national economy, making it even more desirable for the state to disassociate from the “internet” as a metaphor (Zhao, 2021).…”
Section: From “Internet Plus” To “New Infrastructure”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice to abandon the “internet” metaphor is related to the association in China of the “internet” with risky “private capital” during the past five or more years. “Internet Plus” policies opened up “leeway for private cyber giants to influence, if not hijack, the state’s agenda” (Hong, 2017, p. 5), causing alarming issues such as youth gaming-addiction (Rao, 2019), Ponzi schemes and over-indebtedness (Rao, 2020; Rao & McDonald, 2023), and national data security weakness (Ye, 2021). In 2021, China strengthened its control over the rapid expansion of “disorderly internet capitals” that were suspected of “monopolizing” national economy, making it even more desirable for the state to disassociate from the “internet” as a metaphor (Zhao, 2021).…”
Section: From “Internet Plus” To “New Infrastructure”mentioning
confidence: 99%