APPENDIX S1. List of all validly published and selected unpublished names in Onosma and its segregates or allies. Basic information on nomenclature and types is provided here and in Table S2, along with the weblinks (where available) to both the protologues and (Table S2) the (main) type images. For types, the countries and (Table S2) first geographic divisions refer to current geography, while collection localities are verbatim quoted as they are written on the ancient-most labels attached to the specimens. As usual, square brackets are used whenever an ambiguous or misspelled name or expression occurs in a sentence cited from the original, including disambiguation of ancient toponyms, latinized names of places or persons, abbreviated words and acronyms. To avoid redundancies, ICN (Turland et al. 2018) Art. 38.1 (lack of any validating diagnosis, either in Latin/English or in other languages) must be taken into account wherever an invalid "name" is merely marked with "nom. inval. [nom. nud.]" with no additional notes. The general format of a record in the following list is as follows: Name (traditional citation) -Name (synthetic citation). Valid and legitimate names in bold. Link to the protologue (when available). Basionym or replaced synonym (if any). Nomenclatural remarks (if any). Due to a still incomplete systematic/phylogenetic information, no definitive checklist can be provided yet. When suggesting an accepted name, we only wish to provide synonymy which is supported by systematic evidence and/or at least one publication, or is congruent with arguments we explicitly discuss in the present paper (e.g., all our new combinations). Type, followed by remarks on it or the criteria applied for typification (if any).