Drinking pattern is more strongly associated with under-reporting of alcohol consumption than socio-demographic factors: evidence from a mixed-methods study

Abstract

BackgroundUnder-reporting of alcohol consumption is widespread; surveys typically capture 40-60% of alcohol sales. However the population distribution of under-reporting is not well understood.MethodsMixed-methods study to identify factors associated with under-reporting, using the nationally-representative Health Survey for England (HSE) 2011 (overall response rate 66%). Comparison of retrospective computer-assisted personal interview and seven-day drinking diary (n = 3,774 adults 18+, 50% women, diary response rate 69%) to identify factors associated with diary responses exceeding those of the interview using multivariable linear regression for three outcomes: drinking days in the week recorded, volume consumed on heaviest drinking day in the week recorded, and weekly alcohol consumption. Qualitative semi-structured interviews (n = 10) explored reasons for under-reporting in further detail.ResultsNumber of drinking days was slightly greater in the diary than the interview (P < 0.001). Reported consumption was higher in the diary than in the interview for heaviest drinking day in the week recorded (0.7 units greater among men, 1.2 units among women, P < 0.001), and weekly alcohol consumption in women only (1.1 units among women, P = 0.003). Participants who drank more frequently, more heavily, and had a more varied drinking pattern with respect to the types of drink consumed or choice of drinking venues had a larger difference between their diary week and their interview week.The qualitative interviews identified having a non-routine drinking pattern, self-perception as a non-frequent drinker, and usually tracking drinking using experiential approaches as linked to more drinking being reported in the diary than the retrospective interview.ConclusionsHeavy drinking and non-routine drinking patterns may be associated with greater under-reporting of alcohol consumption. Estimates of drinking above recommended levels are likely to be disproportionately under-estimated.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1297) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Alcohol Use and Problem Drinking among Women Firefighters

“…Also, because the study was cross-sectional, it is not possible to determine the direction of relationships among alcohol use and negative occupational outcomes. As in the alcohol literature generally, the women surveyed in this study may have underreported their alcohol use, particularly those with heavier consumption (Boniface, Kneale, & Shelton, 2014; Stockwell, Zhao, & Macdonald, 2014). …”

Socioeconomic status as an effect modifier of alcohol consumption and harm: analysis of linked cohort data

“…Theoretically, systematic reporting differences between social groups could result in bias, although our use of several measures of socioeconomic status reduces the likelihood of this bias. Furthermore, existing research suggests that differential reporting between sociodemographic groups does not seem to be an important source of bias 23 . Third, we have only been able to investigate the effect of total weekly alcohol consumption and binge drinking and not more detailed patterns of alcohol consumption and different types of drink.…”

Underestimating the Alcohol Content of a Glass of Wine: The Implications for Estimates of Mortality Risk

“…This has not been explicitly tested before as most previous work focuses on the characteristics of those who under-report but not whether the updated conversion factors also modify risk associations (Boniface et al , 2014). …”