2017
DOI: 10.1177/0270467617738696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drinking Water Quality in Indian Water Policies, Laws, and Courtrooms: Understanding the Intersections of Science and Law in Developing Countries

Abstract: Drinking water quality has drawn enormous attention from scientific communities, the industrial sector, and the common public in several countries during the last couple of decades. The scholarship in science and technology studies somehow overlooked this crucial domain. This article attempts to contribute to this gray area by exploring how drinking water quality is understood in Indian water policies, laws, and courtrooms. The article argues that water policies and laws in India were significantly shaped by i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arsenic is sporadic in the basement aquifers as the sulphide minerals which hosts are patchy Published in partnership with CECCR at King Abdulaziz University should be noted that the adoption of a national standard is effectively voluntary, as compliance is not enforced. It has limited statutory value as in most cases a consumer cannot make anybody liable for breach of standard limits (Meharg and Raab 2010;Sharma 2017). Higher threshold values assist governments politically by providing theoritically 'safe water' to its citizens.…”
Section: Who Guideline Versus Regional Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arsenic is sporadic in the basement aquifers as the sulphide minerals which hosts are patchy Published in partnership with CECCR at King Abdulaziz University should be noted that the adoption of a national standard is effectively voluntary, as compliance is not enforced. It has limited statutory value as in most cases a consumer cannot make anybody liable for breach of standard limits (Meharg and Raab 2010;Sharma 2017). Higher threshold values assist governments politically by providing theoritically 'safe water' to its citizens.…”
Section: Who Guideline Versus Regional Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%