Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3548606.3560558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DriveFuzz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the more popular method is fuzz testing based on multi-objective optimization (Huai et al, 2023;Cheng et al, 2023;Kim et al, 2022;Li et al, 2020;Tian et al, 2022). The general process of such fuzz testing is as follows:…”
Section: Ads Testing Based On Violated Scenarios Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the more popular method is fuzz testing based on multi-objective optimization (Huai et al, 2023;Cheng et al, 2023;Kim et al, 2022;Li et al, 2020;Tian et al, 2022). The general process of such fuzz testing is as follows:…”
Section: Ads Testing Based On Violated Scenarios Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DriveFuzz proposed by Kim et al (2022), is another search-based test differing from the aforementioned methods. Unlike previous tests, DriveFuzz's scenarios are set in a complete small-town map, providing a more realistic and diverse environment.…”
Section: Search-based Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R3: Reaching Destination. Following existing works [23,27], reaching the assigned destination is one of the most important requirements for an ADS. The violation of reaching the destination is not expected and should be forbidden.…”
Section: Specifications For Adssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a random approach might select a role, a drone and its configuration, a mission, a sequence of HITs and their preconditions, and an associated interaction device. While random fuzzing can provide coverage of a large problem space, it can be inefficient at targeting specific problem scenarios [27,31,36]. Scenario-driven fuzz testing addresses this challenge by directing resources to explore known problem areas in greater detail.…”
Section: Test Fuzzermentioning
confidence: 99%