2013
DOI: 10.1126/science.1235521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driven by Diversity

Abstract: Evidence is growing on benefits, and approaches, to increase diversity in the science and engineering workforce.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FG students constitute roughly 20% of students in American universities and represent a potentially large STEM talent pool, yet they drop out of college at a higher rate (28–35%) than CG students (17%; Chen, 2005; Radford, Berkner, Wheeless, & Shepherd, 2010). If we wish to increase the number of students in science and maximize the chances of discovering talent, it is critically important to promote motivation and performance for underrepresented ethnic minority (URM) and FG students in introductory science courses, which act as a gateway to STEM careers (Ferrini-Mundy, 2013). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FG students constitute roughly 20% of students in American universities and represent a potentially large STEM talent pool, yet they drop out of college at a higher rate (28–35%) than CG students (17%; Chen, 2005; Radford, Berkner, Wheeless, & Shepherd, 2010). If we wish to increase the number of students in science and maximize the chances of discovering talent, it is critically important to promote motivation and performance for underrepresented ethnic minority (URM) and FG students in introductory science courses, which act as a gateway to STEM careers (Ferrini-Mundy, 2013). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few would challenge the necessity for increased diversity as a means of strengthening STEM research and enlarging the future workforce or the ability of BP to contribute to the overall global competitiveness of the United States (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, 2011; Ferrini-Mundy, 2013; Campaign for Science and Engineering, 2014; Valantine and Collins, 2015). When the Framework was published, the NSF’s Broader Impacts merit review criterion (the standard by which all submitted proposals are assessed) included a question about the ability of the proposed activities to broaden the participation of groups underrepresented in science and engineering 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that diversity of thought and background promotes scientific progress (Page, 2008; Ferrini-Mundy, 2013; Freeman and Huang, 2014). Diverse teams of problem solvers outperform groups composed solely of the top performers (Hong and Page, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%