“…As the above discussion illustrates that the IVO-BWMRPT is capable of tackling the complexity of C 2 rather well; next, we consider a demanding situation created by breaking of the triple bond in 1 Σ g + N 2 . ,,,,,,,,,,− Note that CCSD and also CCSD(T) provide an inadequate description of the bond breaking as it yields an unphysical hump on the energy surface at bond distances larger than the equilibrium one. − ,, In our current study, six electrons in six orbitals, CAS(6,6) [involving one σ and two π bonding orbitals as well as the corresponding antibonding orbitals, the smallest reasonable CAS] IVO-CASCI reference, have been used for N 2 as the dominant configuration changes from 3σ g 2 1π u 4 (excluding the first four occupied orbitals) near the equilibrium region to 3σ g 1 1π u 2 1π g 2 3σ u 1 in the dissociation region. Li and Paldus − demonstrated that for larger N–N distances than about 1.5 R e ( R e designates the experimental equilibrium bond length, 2.068 a.u.…”