SAE Technical Paper Series 2001
DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-0045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver Characteristics at Signal-Controlled Intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fugger et al proposed a two-phase constant acceleration model for straight departures at signalized intersections with an initial acceleration rate, which lasts for approximately 0.9 s, followed by a higher secondary acceleration rate ( 26 ). Both acceleration rates are assumed to be constant, which depends on the vehicle type.…”
Section: Modeling Acceleration Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fugger et al proposed a two-phase constant acceleration model for straight departures at signalized intersections with an initial acceleration rate, which lasts for approximately 0.9 s, followed by a higher secondary acceleration rate ( 26 ). Both acceleration rates are assumed to be constant, which depends on the vehicle type.…”
Section: Modeling Acceleration Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…How long does it take for this vehicle to move when a new green ball lights? Certain technical studies 1 have been done on this starting activity. However, the actual position of the vehicle as first, second, or third in the queue at the stop line will change the departure interval parameter length.…”
Section: Vehicle Actions and Site Geometry As Sources Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the above formulae, along with reasonable values for V1 (e.g., PR1 of 1 second; ACCEL1 of 0.15 g [See Fricke, 1990; Table 1 incorporates other estimates, e.g., Fugger et al, 2001]) and a D1 of 25 feet, D2 of 50 feet, VEL2 of 35 miles per hour, and an ARC of 1.5 seconds, the following is obtained: T2 is approximately 1 second and T1 is approximately 3.2 seconds. Thus, REDRUN2 is approximately 4.7 seconds.…”
Section: T2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact timing depends on the various inputs (e.g., D1 and D2 as determined by intersection geometry and lane assignments, acceleration rate and perception-reaction time of V1, V2's speed, and all red clear), but the conclusion is robust over a considerable range of input values (see Table 1). Using a larger value for PR1 (see, e.g., Fugger et al, 2001) will increase REDRUN2 accordingly, as will increasing ARC.…”
Section: T2mentioning
confidence: 99%