2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappmathmech.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver directional control using two-point preview and fuzzy decision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tracking performance of the driver model can be improved by adaptively adjust preview distance according to the vehicle current tracking error and road curvature [26], which simulates the near-far scanning behavior of human drivers [28]. For TP preview reference, it can be combined with FP preview reference, which allow the driver model preview the far TP and near FP point [29]. However, none of them fully represents human drivers' preview mechanism, since drivers would also adjust their visual gaze point in the lateral direction on the road during driving process [25].…”
Section: Single Point Preview-based Human-like Driver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracking performance of the driver model can be improved by adaptively adjust preview distance according to the vehicle current tracking error and road curvature [26], which simulates the near-far scanning behavior of human drivers [28]. For TP preview reference, it can be combined with FP preview reference, which allow the driver model preview the far TP and near FP point [29]. However, none of them fully represents human drivers' preview mechanism, since drivers would also adjust their visual gaze point in the lateral direction on the road during driving process [25].…”
Section: Single Point Preview-based Human-like Driver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submit the Taylor series expansion of into (12), and the first two terms of the series are considered due to being small. We have…”
Section: Focus Point Preview Driver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been widely applied because of its simple structure and clear physical meaning [10]. Two-point preview models are built based on the far and near preview cues, assuming that drivers employ the near and far preview points to estimate the required steering wheel angle to control the vehicle [11][12][13]. Unlike the single-point and two-point preview model, the multiplepoint model assumes that drivers focus on a front regional road to get multiple points of deviation [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preview information can be defined based on a single point [7], two points [8,9], or multiple points [10,11] along the future road. The single-point preview model assumes that drivers mainly focus on one point of the future road to obtain the lateral deviation and, then, control the direction of the vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the control methods, there are three main types: classical control based on transfer functions such as proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control [15], modern control based on state space models such as the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) [11,16] and model predictive control (MPC) [17], and intelligent control based on the imitation of driver behavior such as fuzzy logic (FL) [9,18] and neural networks (NNs) [19]. The classical control methods are generally applied to a single-input, single-output system and are not suitable for the control of time-varying and nonlinear vehicle models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%