Automated driving has the potential to support drivers, freeing them up to do other things, such as work, rest or play. The problem is that in the present instantiation, automated driving requires the driver to perform a monitoring function and be ready to intervene if required. This is the worst of all worlds of automation. The monitoring task can be (if performed properly) more demanding than manual driving and the driver is not freed up to do other things. Worse still, is that the monitoring task cannot be sustained for long and, on occasions, led to a vehicle collisions because the driver cannot intervene in a timely manner. One of the first studies conducted over twenty years shows this to be the case and there really have not been any improvements since. This special issue reports on the latest development in vehicle automation and points to future directions that research should be directed.
Relevance to human factors/Relevance to ergonomics theoryDriving Automation and Autonomy is already upon us and the problems that were predicted twenty years ago are beginning to appear. These problems include shortfalls in expected benefits, equipment unreliability, driver skill fade, and error-inducing equipment designs. In addition, the driver becomes both physically and mentally detached from the task of driving and may engage with other non-driving tasks. Ironically, if the driver does not engage with other tasks then can suffer from reduced attentional resources (making them less able to regain control from the vehicle in an emergency). If the driver does engage with other non-driving tasks then their attentional resource pool do not deplete to the same extent (offering a protective effect) but the distraction of the other task(s) can slow down the reclaim of vehicle control from automation. This is one of the main dilemmas with automated driving, which the papers in this special issue address to a greater or lesser extent.