2017
DOI: 10.1108/ebr-03-2016-0050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers and barriers to reshoring: a literature review on offshoring in reverse

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to clarify the rather blurry concept of reshoring and its main drivers and barriers. At the same time the paper seeks to provide a much-needed overview of the scientific theories employed in previous research on reshoring. Design/methodology/approach: The paper gathers information from previous published research. Data was collected through a systematic literature review on 'reshoring' using primarily qualitative research techniques. Through a structured keyword search and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
227
0
16

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(198 reference statements)
4
227
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…For this comparison, two existing systematic literature reviews were used ( [15], [48]), which resulted in 22 and 20 selected publications for reshoring manufacturing. Although those reviews are similar in their analysed literature and period, different methods of categorizing the drivers for reshoring manufacturing were used.…”
Section: (B) Comparison To Manufacturing Backshoring Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this comparison, two existing systematic literature reviews were used ( [15], [48]), which resulted in 22 and 20 selected publications for reshoring manufacturing. Although those reviews are similar in their analysed literature and period, different methods of categorizing the drivers for reshoring manufacturing were used.…”
Section: (B) Comparison To Manufacturing Backshoring Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, Wiesmann et al [48] considered an economic perspective by selecting the following driver categories: global competitive dynamics, host and home country, supply chain and firm specifics.…”
Section: (B) Comparison To Manufacturing Backshoring Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litteraturen viser til et flertall ulike bakenforliggende årsaker til trenden, hvor fokus varierer fra ambisjonen om å forklare drivkreftene for beslutningene, til studier som omhandler effektivitet i lokale verdikjeder. Motiv som ofte blir belyst er eksterne endringer i markedet, som økte kostnader i tradisjonelle lavkostland, økt trykk for mer fleksibilitet relatert til kundekrav, naerhet til markeder, samt inntoget av mer avansert teknologi (Arlbjørn & Mikkelsen 2014, Bals, Daum & Tate 2015, Ellram, Tate & Petersen 2013, Kinkel 2014, Kinkel & Maloca 2009, Wiesmann, Snoei, Hilletofth & Eriksson 2017. Endringer i de politiske rammevilkårene har også blitt rapportert som motiv for å vurdere backshoring.…”
Section: Kobling Til Eksisterende Forskningunclassified
“…Det er imidlertid studier som rapporterer en positiv sammenheng mellom økende salgstall, redusert ledetid og backshoring (se for eksempel Gylling, Heikkilä, Jussila & Saarinen 2015). Det bør likevel nevnes at den mest omfattende forskningen innen feltet først og fremst tar utgangspunkt i eksisterende forskningsgap, og i mindre grad på hvordan bedrifter bør bruke eller implementere en backshoringsstrategi (Stentoft, Olhagar, Heikkilä & Thomas 2016, Wiesmann et al 2017. Dette kan selvfølgelig skyldes det faktum at backshoring er et relativt nytt fenomen, og at det er en mangel på case-studier på feltet, og derfor er det vanskelig å presentere noen konkrete innsikter eller konklusjoner.…”
Section: Kobling Til Eksisterende Forskningunclassified
“…Accompanying benefits and risks of various sourcing strategies are the subject of discussion by a variety of academics and practitioners (e.g. Holweg et al, 2011;Åkesson et al, 2007;Wiesmann et al, 2017). Benefits of sourcing from developing countries, like China, cover aspects such as cost savings, increased capacity, enhanced flexibility and access to skilled and qualified human resources (Coyle et al, 2013;Harland et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%