Drivers and constraints of land use transitions on Western grasslands: insights from a California mountain ranching community

Abstract

Context Land use change drives a host of sustainability challenges on Earth’s grasslands. To understand the relationship between changing land use patterns, human well-being, and ecosystem services, research is needed into land use transitions on privately-owned grasslands. Such inquiry lies at the intersection of land system science, landscape sustainability science and environmental governance. Objectives This study investigated land use change in a mountain ranching community in the Sierra Nevada, California. The research objective was to highlight factors influencing land use transitions and corollary ecological outcomes on privately-owned grasslands in the Western US. Methods This mixed methods case study integrated participant observation, 30 semi-structured interviews, and analysis of land cover and real estate data. Interviews were conducted with ranchers, public agencies, and conservation and real estate industry representatives, and analyzed with the constant comparison method using NVivo 12. Results Land use transitions in the case study region include agricultural intensification, residential and solar development, and disintensification. These transitions were influenced by many factors including decreasing land access and water availability, amenity migration, intergenerational succession, and conservation policy. Conclusions By highlighting factors influencing land use transitions on working lands, this study can be applied to improve the uptake of environmental policies. For the future, several approaches may support grasslands conservation: ensuring grazing lands access, income diversification, groundwater regulations, agriculture-compatible conservation easements, and land use policies supporting ownership transition to amenity purposes rather than low-density residential development. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-021-01385-6.

Does landscape ecology matter to a country's financial development? Evidence from China

“…Energy consumption from renewable energy sources also positively impacts China's growth and development. The findings are consistent with the study of Buckley Biggs (2022) while being in opposition to the study of Zhang and Li (2022).…”

“…The capital injection greatly aided ecological progress in the economy. It is crucial to learn about the financial mechanisms that can propel the growth of green ecology (Buckley Biggs, 2022). High standards of landscape quality are becoming increasingly important to people in developed countries, particularly in rapidly urbanizing areas and places with rapidly expanding industrial agriculture techniques (Hwang et al, 2022).…”

“…The study by Sahay et al (2020) evaluated landscape effectiveness in the context of sustainable development. It means that we use the world and its natural resources in a way that considers their full range of ecological, social, and economic roles without jeopardizing their ability to provide for future generations (Buckley Biggs, 2022). Other researchers (Kumari et al, 2021;Minh et al, 2021;Sohibien et al, 2022) have also studied developing economies' green ecology and economic growth.…”

Impacts of Land Use Transition on Ecosystem Services in the Dongting Lake Area

“…Research has demonstrated that ESs are a key component of ecological security [9]. Natural variables like temperature and rainfall, as well as socioeconomic factors like population growth, construction site expansion, and economic development, all have an impact on ESs [10]. Of these, land use change has a major impact on ESs [11].…”

Spatiotemporal analysis of land use changes and their trade-offs on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains, China

“…At present, studies of land use dominant morphology mainly focus on land use transition research (Long et al, 2021). Much attention had paid to the evolution of land use structure and the changes in the proportion of various land use categories (Ouedraogo et al, 2016;Buckley Biggs, 2022). They found that the proportions and areas of artificial land, especially urban construction land, gradually increased during the process of urbanization and industrialization, while those of natural land, such as forest, grassland, and unused land, displayed significant decreasing trends simultaneously.…”