2016
DOI: 10.1177/0269094216655520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers for differences in dairy farmers’ perceptions of farm development strategies in an area with nature and landscape as protected public goods

Abstract: Nature and landscape are increasingly appreciated as public goods and community assets in need of protection. Policy schemes aiming to protect vulnerable nature and landscape assets affect options for farm development and thus the opportunities for farm income strategies. Farmers as small business owners need to counter an ongoing income squeeze in their strategic decision. Farmers’ perception of the options affects strategic decision making. In a case study with dairy farmers operating in a highly comparable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The construct pRfM is defined in this study as 'the opportunities perceived as viable in order to obtain a (substantial part of) business income'. In the survey, 79 dairy farmers (out of in total 102 farmers addressed) indicated on a 5-point Likert scale the perceived viability for a list of 15 opportunities for farm development to generate a substantial part of farm income (for a detailed description of methodology see [41,42]). This list of opportunities was created in the exploratory phase using the literature and interviews with farmers and stakeholders of farm development in the Kampereiland area.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The construct pRfM is defined in this study as 'the opportunities perceived as viable in order to obtain a (substantial part of) business income'. In the survey, 79 dairy farmers (out of in total 102 farmers addressed) indicated on a 5-point Likert scale the perceived viability for a list of 15 opportunities for farm development to generate a substantial part of farm income (for a detailed description of methodology see [41,42]). This list of opportunities was created in the exploratory phase using the literature and interviews with farmers and stakeholders of farm development in the Kampereiland area.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were statistically analysed using a two-stage cluster analysis, leading to four clusters of farmers that represent coherent and consistent patterns of farm development that were validated as meaningful by stakeholders [41]. In the next step of the study, it was found that the personal views and preferences of the farmer are the most influential drivers to explain the differences between farmers [42]. In the present paper, the third and final step is described: this step aims to study the three-fold embedding of the different patterns of farm development using the ideal-typical farm practices of the patterns.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specific state of suspension of a farm may be a prelude to professionalization or withdrawal from the market. This strategy is often applied on farms with unsolved inheritance problems (Methorst, Roep, Verhees and Verstegen, 2016;Mishra, El-Osta and Johnson, 2004).…”
Section: Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnejmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of de boer zelf ook mogelijkheden ziet, heeft te maken met inschatting van risico en met durf en ondernemerschap (Emery & Franks, 2012;Ingram et al 2013). Methorst et al (2016) noemen dit de 'perceived room for manoeuvre', wat wordt bepaald door hoe de boer zichzelf ziet, de persoonlijke ontwikkeling, de kijk op het eigen ondernemerschap, hoe hij de huidige situatie van het bedrijf en de markt beoordeelt en toekomst voor het bedrijf. Het beïnvloeden van het kunnen, door boeren in staat te stellen ook daadwerkelijk andere keuzes te maken, kan met de diverse economische instrumenten, met het aanpassen van belemmerende regelgeving, het stimuleren van technologische innovatie, opleiding en leernetwerken.…”
Section: Inpasbaarheid Bepaalt Mede De Deelnamebereidheidunclassified