2014
DOI: 10.1108/srj-10-2012-0116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of corporate community involvement and challenges in measuring its impact

Abstract: His research lies in distribution channels, retailing, macromarketing, strategic marketing of product and service innovations, and marketing strategy. His work has appeared in such journals as the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSR has influenced various elements of businesses such as the impact of CSR behavior on the greater community (Albinger & Freeman, 2000;Arli & Cadeaux, 2014;Oppewal, Alexander, & Sullivan, 2006;Sen & Bhattacharya, 2001), the juxtaposition of CSR and the management of the multiple interests of multiple stakeholders (Matten, Crane, & Chapple, 2003;Waddock, 2004), the price consumers are willing to pay for CSR (Creyer & Ross, 1996;Karem, Abou, & El-Bassiouny, 2012;Parsa, Kenneth, Putrevu & Kreeger, 2015, discussion of CSR in the context of consumer loyalty (Bhattacharya & Sen, 2003;Lichtenstein, Drumwright, & Braig, 2004), reconceptualization of the store image (Gupta & Pirsch, 2008); the influence of CSR on financial performance (Orlitzky, 2003), and the effect of hypocrisy and inconsistent CSR messages on consumer purchase decisions (Wagner et al, 2009). These studies reveal the many areas within the CSR domain that have received academic attention.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSR has influenced various elements of businesses such as the impact of CSR behavior on the greater community (Albinger & Freeman, 2000;Arli & Cadeaux, 2014;Oppewal, Alexander, & Sullivan, 2006;Sen & Bhattacharya, 2001), the juxtaposition of CSR and the management of the multiple interests of multiple stakeholders (Matten, Crane, & Chapple, 2003;Waddock, 2004), the price consumers are willing to pay for CSR (Creyer & Ross, 1996;Karem, Abou, & El-Bassiouny, 2012;Parsa, Kenneth, Putrevu & Kreeger, 2015, discussion of CSR in the context of consumer loyalty (Bhattacharya & Sen, 2003;Lichtenstein, Drumwright, & Braig, 2004), reconceptualization of the store image (Gupta & Pirsch, 2008); the influence of CSR on financial performance (Orlitzky, 2003), and the effect of hypocrisy and inconsistent CSR messages on consumer purchase decisions (Wagner et al, 2009). These studies reveal the many areas within the CSR domain that have received academic attention.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although locating responsibility for CSR at the board level has proven to strengthen the quality of CSR programs (Graafland and Smid, 2019), the literature generally finds that there is a lack of interest by senior-level managers in measuring CSR outcomes (Arli and Cadeaux, 2014). The main reasons for this include doubt about who will read the evaluation reports and the low level of interest of most stakeholders in such information.…”
Section: Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Company managers may not perceive that they benefit from the evaluation (especially from elaborate forms of measurement), and typically they are only interested in their flagship programs, often on which they spend most of their social investment budget (Arli and Cadeaux, 2014). The absence of interest from high-level management leads to assigning little time and resources to measurement activities.…”
Section: Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations