2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00744.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility Attitudes: The Demography of Socially Responsible Investors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
94
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(106 reference statements)
10
94
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The generally accepted view is that welleducated and less wealthy women or young adults are concerned about SR issues in the investment decision to a higher degree. Several studies such as Beal and Goyen (1998), Rosen et al (1991), Tippet and Leung (2001), Beal et al (2005), Schueth (2003), Haigh (2008), Nilsson (2008), Nilsson (2009), Junkus and Berry (2010), Cheah et al (2011) and Pérez-Gladish et al (2012) confirm this point of view. On the contrary, McLachlan and Gardner (2004) and Williams (2007) find little evidence that ethical investors differ in demographics compared to their conventional counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The generally accepted view is that welleducated and less wealthy women or young adults are concerned about SR issues in the investment decision to a higher degree. Several studies such as Beal and Goyen (1998), Rosen et al (1991), Tippet and Leung (2001), Beal et al (2005), Schueth (2003), Haigh (2008), Nilsson (2008), Nilsson (2009), Junkus and Berry (2010), Cheah et al (2011) and Pérez-Gladish et al (2012) confirm this point of view. On the contrary, McLachlan and Gardner (2004) and Williams (2007) find little evidence that ethical investors differ in demographics compared to their conventional counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Generally, there is no valid approach on how to differentiate between SR and conventional investors. Since SR investments may also attract conventional investors, it does not mean that the involvement of SR investment products in one's individual portfolio signalizes an SR investor (Cheah et al 2011). Different from Wins and Zwergel (2014), who compare ethical investors, conventional investors and those who are generally interested in SRI, we are primarily interested in whether the respondents are driven by social, ecological or ethical principles in their decision-making process.…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with the first perspective described by Moser and Martin (2012), namely, that companies engage in socially responsible activities in order to maximize shareholder value. It is also in agreement with a third view of SRI described by Cheah et al (2011), which is that socially responsible companies are more profitable than socially irresponsible companies.…”
Section: Investor Attitudes and Socially Responsible Investment Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The hegemony of the Western DSP, however, suggests that investors may be slow to accept this worldview. Thus, it appears that both perspectives on socially responsible corporate activities described by Moser and Martin (2012), as well as the divergent investor views on SRI described by Cheah et al (2011), indicate that investors' reliance on SRI screens and their SRI choices will depend on their attitudes.…”
Section: Investor Attitudes and Socially Responsible Investment Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation