2020
DOI: 10.1108/ict-06-2019-0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of employee engagement: differences by work area and gender

Abstract: Purpose Previous studies have not integrated the impact of the area of study into the notion of employee engagement. The purpose of this study is to empirically measure the association between employee engagement and the two antecedent factors of perceived organizational support (POS) and employee loyalty across different areas of study. Design/methodology/approach A nationally representative survey of 2,408 adults in the USA collected by the worker representation and participation survey (WRPS) was used. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
32
2
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
32
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Employee engagement can be defined as 'a positive, fulfilling motivational state of work-related well-being' (Wood, Oh, Park, & Kim, 2020, p. 242). Employee engagement has consistently been correlated with several important organisational outcomes (Bailey, Madden, Alfes, & Fletcher, 2017) that constitute a competitive advantage (Schneider, Yost, Kropp, Kind, & Lam, 2018), such as enhanced commitment and performance, reduced absenteeism (Schaufeli, 2013), enhanced organisational financial returns and organisational effectiveness (Khodakarami & Dirani, 2020) and positive financial and customer metrics (Bailey et al, 2017;Schneider et al, 2018).…”
Section: Employee Engagement Outcomes and Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Employee engagement can be defined as 'a positive, fulfilling motivational state of work-related well-being' (Wood, Oh, Park, & Kim, 2020, p. 242). Employee engagement has consistently been correlated with several important organisational outcomes (Bailey, Madden, Alfes, & Fletcher, 2017) that constitute a competitive advantage (Schneider, Yost, Kropp, Kind, & Lam, 2018), such as enhanced commitment and performance, reduced absenteeism (Schaufeli, 2013), enhanced organisational financial returns and organisational effectiveness (Khodakarami & Dirani, 2020) and positive financial and customer metrics (Bailey et al, 2017;Schneider et al, 2018).…”
Section: Employee Engagement Outcomes and Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working from home, or remote work, is a flexible working arrangement (FWA), which consistently correlates with important organisational benefits, such as improved employee engagement and performance (Conradie & De Klerk, 2019;Lee, 2018;Rudolph & Baltes, 2017), and reduced absenteeism (Schaufeli, 2013), enhanced financial returns and organisational effectiveness (Khodakarami & Dirani, 2020). However, extensive remote working can also yield disadvantages, such as social isolation and reduced employee engagement (Sardeshmukh, Sharma, & Golden, 2012;Vander Elst et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, professional learning for teachers tend to include reflective activities (Yang & Liu, 2004), whereas medical professions tend to have knowledge check activities such as tests or quizzes (Baia & Strang, 2016). This in turn could result in differences in engagement processes between industries (Khodakarami & Dirani, 2020).…”
Section: Potential Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work provided merit to an ongoing discourse between researchers, who argue that engagement is particularly about the job role and those that claim that engagement can be exhibited through a diverse set of roles (Schaufeli et al, 2002;Schaufeli and Salanova, 2007;Macey and Schneider, 2008;Guest, 2013). In particular, this model can be observed through multiple foci of engagement, as an employee can be engaged toward different characteristics within the organization (Khodakarami & Dirani, 2020). Therefore, an employee could be engaged to the job, the leaders, the organization, or exhibit the engagement toward more than one of these.…”
Section: The Conceptualization Of Employee Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%