Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR

Abstract

The authors use empirical research into the environmental practices of 31 manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to show that ‚business performance’ and ‚regulation’ considerations drive behaviour. They suggest that this is inevitable, given the market-based decision-making frames that permeate and dominate the industry in which manufacturing SMEs operate. Since the environment is a pillar of corporate social responsibility (CSR), the findings have important implications for CSR policy, which promotes voluntary actions predicated on a business case. It is argued that this approach will not alter the behaviour of manufacturing SMEs significantly because CSR practice will be regarded as an optional and costly ‚extra’ affecting core business activity. Consequently, the use and development of existing regulatory structures, providing minimum standards for many activities covered by CSR, remains the most effective means through which the behaviour of manufacturing SMEs will be changed in the short to medium-term. Another feature of the paper is the distinction made between ‚business performance’ and the ‚business case’ argument. Business performance emphasises cost reductions and efficiency whereas the business case accentuates the benefits to shareholders of good practices as their firms become more attractive to stakeholders and society. Manufacturing SMEsâ\x90£try to improve business performance because of the pressures placed on them by market-dominated decision-making frames. These frames do not encourage manufacturing SMEs to undertake voluntary actions for the benefit of wider stakeholders and society. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006CSR, decision-making frames, environment, policy, regulation, SMEs,

Circular Economy and Decision Models among European SMEs

“…Most of the literature on sustainability entrepreneurship addresses large and industrial companies, so SMEs are sometimes overlooked, even if the understanding of limiting and facilitating factors for their business decisions could have a significant benefit for management theory and practice [3,10,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. In fact, there are authors that believe that SMEs are generally one step behind in their implementation of environmental measures [9,23].…”

Understanding the drivers of sustainable entrepreneurial practices in Pakistan’s leather industry

“…The results of such studies appear encouraging for policy makers seeking to steer the environmental behaviour of small businesses through regulatory interventions (Revell et al, 2010;Tilley, 1999). However, it is argued that unless the inherent complexities in regulations are reduced, they are made less cost intensive (Williamson et al, 2006;Wilson et al, 2012) and their threat is transformed into an opportunity (Studer et al, 2006), compliance would remain the least appealing driver of environmental improvement in SMEs.…”

A Review of Interventions to Encourage SMEs to Make Environmental Improvements

“…(Bradford and Fraser, 2008;Pimenova and van der Vorst, 2004;Studer et al, 2006;Williamson et al, 2006), and whether these regulations are enforced fully among all SMEs by authorities (Mir and Feitelson, 2007;Revell and Blackburn, 2007). Environmental commitment Extent to which SME owner-managers or employees believe they have a responsibility to engage in environmental improvement (Collins et al, 2007;Masurel, 2007;Pimenova and van der Vorst, 2004;Simpson et al, 2004), proactively undertake environmental improvement actions (AragonCorrea and Cordon-Pozo, 2005;Roy and Therin, 2008) and believe their business has an environmental impact (Bradford and Fraser, 2008;Drake et al, 2004;Mir and Feitelson, 2007).…”