2010
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of Finished-Goods Inventory in the U.S. Automobile Industry

Abstract: A utomobile manufacturers in the U.S. supply chain exhibit significant differences in their days of supply of finished vehicles (average inventory divided by average daily sales rate). For example, from 1995 to 2004, Toyota consistently carried approximately 30 fewer days of supply than General Motors. This suggests that Toyota's well-documented advantage in manufacturing efficiency, product design, and upstream supply chain management extends to their finished-goods inventory in their downstream supply chain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
118
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Industry-specific papers include those by Olivares and Cachon (2009) and Cachon and Olivares (2010), which identify the key drivers that explain the variation in the finished goods inventory within the automotive distribution system. There is also work that investigates the factors that affect inventory record accuracy (DeHoratius and Raman 2008) and when managers decide to deviate from the inventory recommendations of an automated ordering system (van Donselaar et al 2010).…”
Section: Supply Chain Management (Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industry-specific papers include those by Olivares and Cachon (2009) and Cachon and Olivares (2010), which identify the key drivers that explain the variation in the finished goods inventory within the automotive distribution system. There is also work that investigates the factors that affect inventory record accuracy (DeHoratius and Raman 2008) and when managers decide to deviate from the inventory recommendations of an automated ordering system (van Donselaar et al 2010).…”
Section: Supply Chain Management (Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, the automotive industry is the very spot where virtually every kind of new managerial idea is experimentally invited in to be applied in a variety of areas, and therefore it has had tremendous use as a research setting in which scholars interested in organizational studies examine their ideas (e.g., Cachon & Olivares, 2010;Chung, Mitchell, & Yeung, 2003;Dobrev, Kim, & Carroll, 2002;Dobrev, Kim, & Hannan, 2001;English & Marchione, 1983;Goyal, Netessine, & Randall, 2006;Haunschild & Rhee, 2004;Lieberman & Demeester, 1999;Lieberman et al, 1990;MacDuffie, Sethuraman, & Fisher, 1996;Rhee & Haunschild, 2006;Rhee, Kim, & Han, 2006). More specifically, a great number of studies about experiential learning have been conducted by using this industry (e.g., Haunschild & Rhee, 2004;Lieberman & Demeester, 1999;MacDuffie et al, 1996;Rhee & Haunschild, 2006).…”
Section: Chapter 3 Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Cachon & Olivares, 2010;Levin, 2000), and the present study also uses it as a main source for operation-related information and data regarding the manufacturing processes of automotive engine plants. In this study, the research period begins in 1995 mainly to make sure of the continuity of data over the years, because the report substantially changed its data collecting scheme beginning in 1995 (The Harbour Report, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research thus also relates to the endogenous product choice literature, as we deal with the endogeneity of both pricing and the warranty length decision by firms. Finally, our research is related to the numerous empirical studies in OM that examine the automobile industry, including Fisher et al (1999), Ramdas and Randall (2008), Cachon and Olivares (2010), and Gallino et al (2013), among many others, that as ours attempt to examine some aspect that contribute to an understanding of factors influencing the matching between what firms supply and what consumers demand in this industry.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%