2019
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of the great housing boom‐bust: Credit conditions, beliefs, or both?

Abstract: Two potential driving forces of house price fluctuations are commonly cited: credit conditions and beliefs. We posit some simple empirical calculations using direct measures of credit conditions and beliefs to consider their potentially distinct roles in house price fluctuations at the aggregate level. Changes in credit conditions are positively related to the fraction of riskier nonconforming debt in total mortgage lending, while measures of beliefs are unrelated to this ratio. Credit conditions explain quant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have noted how bank credit supply contributed to the recent boom-bust housing cycle in the late 2000s. Cox and Ludvigson (2019) find that changes in credit supply are negatively correlated with loan quality changes between 2000 and 2010, and the decreases in loan quality could both explain for house price changes and predict them. Di Maggio and Kermani (2017) allege that the preemption rule in 2004, which exempted national banks from antipredatory lending laws in the U.S., contributed to the rise and fall of credit supply, house price and unemployment rate between 2004and 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Studies have noted how bank credit supply contributed to the recent boom-bust housing cycle in the late 2000s. Cox and Ludvigson (2019) find that changes in credit supply are negatively correlated with loan quality changes between 2000 and 2010, and the decreases in loan quality could both explain for house price changes and predict them. Di Maggio and Kermani (2017) allege that the preemption rule in 2004, which exempted national banks from antipredatory lending laws in the U.S., contributed to the rise and fall of credit supply, house price and unemployment rate between 2004and 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Basically, most lending institutions adjust interest rates to reflect the market value by less than 1%. Further, the author argues that the reason that banks increase interest rates by a small margin is to reduce default rate [5]. Cumming & Hubert also argues along the same line as Cox and Ludvigson, but he gives a different reason to validate his point.…”
Section: Prices Rise By a Small Marginmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Certainly, paying $117 more every month would not push many potential buyers away. Indeed, high interest rates pose an extra burden to homebuyers, but not everyone feels the impact [5].…”
Section: Consumer Confidence and Home Buying Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These areas have amplified the degree of prosperity and depression of the real estate market, which was in line with the expectation of belief heterogeneity [ 19 , 20 ]. Some other scholars emphasized the important impact of loose monetary policy, cheaper credit and expectations of house prices from the perspective of home buyers’ characteristics and believed that the credit costs are the most important factor driving house price fluctuations [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%