2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2005.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: A cost function approach with endogenous output

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous literature that considered various countries [6,16,45,67,69,72,74,75], we find that economies of density also characterize the Danish water industry, but only when the wastewater sector is studied. Figure 3 shows the relationship between population density and VRSTE.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with previous literature that considered various countries [6,16,45,67,69,72,74,75], we find that economies of density also characterize the Danish water industry, but only when the wastewater sector is studied. Figure 3 shows the relationship between population density and VRSTE.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is confirmed by the negative estimator for SIZE when VRSTE is regressed: The high significance shows diseconomies of scale for pure technical efficiency in the wastewater sector. This evidence contrasts with research demonstrating economies of scale in water and/or wastewater sectors, at least to a certain threshold [22,30,[69][70][71][72]. For Italy, Romano and Guerrini [24] found that firms serving more than 50,000 customers achieve better performance than those serving a smaller population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A second set of activities deals with the collection of waste water through the sewage network and the disposal of the effluent in the sewage treatment works so that water can be returned to its natural environment. There is a body of literature that attempts to model water and sewerage technology and cost structure (among the others, see the studies of Fabbri and Fraquelli, 2000;Garcia and Thomas, 2001;Mizutani and Urakami, 2001;Torres and Morrison Paul, 2006). The choice of inputs and outputs described below is generally consistent with this literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the first case, the input use is minimized given a certain amount of output, while in the second the output is maximized for a given level of inputs. Generally, the adoption of an input-oriented framework is preferred when public utilities are considered as the demand of service the suppliers must provide may be seen as exogenous (see Torres and Morrison Paul, 2006, for an application with endogenous output). 9 For a comprehensive description of DEA models, see Thanassoulis (2001) and Coelli et al (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output variables are total water delivered to consumers, the number of connected properties and the total area served by the company. This exact output specification has been previously employed for English and Welsh water companies in Bottasso & Conti (2009b), and is consistent with a well-established literature suggesting the need to fully control for volumes, connections, and a utility's geographic scale (See, for example Torres & Morrison Paul, 2006) Control variables are included so as to allow for differences in production technology that may result from differences in operating environment. For example, water could come from impounding reservoirs, boreholes or rivers.…”
Section: Data and Empirical Specificationmentioning
confidence: 63%