2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving with intelligent speed adaptation: Final results of the Belgian ISA-trial

Abstract: In October 2002 the first ISA-trial in Belgium was started in Ghent. Thirty-four cars and three buses were equipped with the ''active accelerator pedal''. In this system a resistance in the accelerator is activated when the driver attempts to exceed the speed limit. If necessary, the driver can overrule the system. The main research goals of the trial in Ghent were to evaluate the effects of ISA on speed-change, traffic safety, drivers' attitude, behaviour and drivers' acceptance. To study these effects of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overview of different types of ISA (Morsink et al, 2006)] In most ISA studies, acceptance and acceptability refer to the opinions, attitudes, and values of the users relative to the experience they had when driving with the system (Brookhuis & De Waard, 1999;Comte et al, 2000;Vlassenroot et al, 2007;Young & Regan, 2007). In these studies, acceptance is measured by comparing behavioural changes when driving without ISA before using the device and driving with ISA and finally driving without ISA after the test period (Adell et al, 2008;Biding & Lind, 2002;Hjalmdahl & Varhelyi, 2004;Katteler, 2005).…”
Section: A Cceptance Measurements In Isa Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overview of different types of ISA (Morsink et al, 2006)] In most ISA studies, acceptance and acceptability refer to the opinions, attitudes, and values of the users relative to the experience they had when driving with the system (Brookhuis & De Waard, 1999;Comte et al, 2000;Vlassenroot et al, 2007;Young & Regan, 2007). In these studies, acceptance is measured by comparing behavioural changes when driving without ISA before using the device and driving with ISA and finally driving without ISA after the test period (Adell et al, 2008;Biding & Lind, 2002;Hjalmdahl & Varhelyi, 2004;Katteler, 2005).…”
Section: A Cceptance Measurements In Isa Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several simulation experiments [16], [17] and field tests [18], [19], [20], [21], [22] have been conducted to evaluate the impact of different ISA systems on driver behaviour [23]. In general, these systems have resulted in speed limit compliance through reduced speed variances, maximum speeds, and the percentage of time spent driving above posted speeds.…”
Section: B Isa and Behavioural Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speed percentile rankings are another metric used to quantify driving behavioural changes, and have been used in previous studies to measure the effectiveness of ISA systems [21], [16]. This section presents 85th percentile speeds, and relevant speed percentile crossings for the different warning intensities as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Speed Percentilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible solution to coping with inexperienced users is to provide certain semi-autonomous functions that can predict and avoid possible hazardous situations. Such systems are growing rapidly for example in automotive industry [11] [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%