2024
DOI: 10.1002/ppj2.20100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drone‐based imaging sensors, techniques, and applications in plant phenotyping for crop breeding: A comprehensive review

Boubacar Gano,
Sourav Bhadra,
Justin M. Vilbig
et al.

Abstract: Over the last decade, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for plant phenotyping and field crop monitoring has significantly evolved and expanded. These technologies have been particularly valuable for monitoring crop growth and health and for managing abiotic and biotic stresses such as drought, fertilization deficiencies, disease, and bioaggressors. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the progress in UAV‐based plant phenotyping, with a focus on the current use and application of drone technol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 222 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is worth noting that UAS collection and analysis technologies will continue to improve in speed and accuracy for DTT, while DTA can not be further scaled or improved. More importantly many other phenotypes and predictions can simultaneously be made using the same UAS data (Gano et al 2024), such as plant height (Anderson et al 2019, Pugh et al 2018, Tirado et al 2020), yield predictions (Kumar et al 2023, Sunoj et al 2021, Barzin et al 2020), disease (Wu et al 2019, Chivasa et al 2021, De Salvio et al 2022), and further enhance our understanding of the phenome (Murray et al 2023). Nevertheless, a recent survey identified the “high cost of instruments/devices or software” and the “Lack of knowledge or trained personnel to analyze data” as important barriers to UAS adoption (Lachowiec et al 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is worth noting that UAS collection and analysis technologies will continue to improve in speed and accuracy for DTT, while DTA can not be further scaled or improved. More importantly many other phenotypes and predictions can simultaneously be made using the same UAS data (Gano et al 2024), such as plant height (Anderson et al 2019, Pugh et al 2018, Tirado et al 2020), yield predictions (Kumar et al 2023, Sunoj et al 2021, Barzin et al 2020), disease (Wu et al 2019, Chivasa et al 2021, De Salvio et al 2022), and further enhance our understanding of the phenome (Murray et al 2023). Nevertheless, a recent survey identified the “high cost of instruments/devices or software” and the “Lack of knowledge or trained personnel to analyze data” as important barriers to UAS adoption (Lachowiec et al 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%