2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22041453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drone Detection and Defense Systems: Survey and a Software-Defined Radio-Based Solution

Abstract: With the decrease in the cost and size of drones in recent years, their number has also increased exponentially. As such, the concerns regarding security aspects that are raised by their presence are also becoming more serious. The necessity of designing and implementing systems that are able to detect and provide defense actions against such threats has become apparent. In this paper, we perform a survey regarding the different drone detection and defense systems that were proposed in the literature, based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, now we have more friendly interfaces exploiting natural interactions and enhanced by improved self-stabilization drone mechanisms. Many recent works deal with drone communication protocols (Hassija et al, 2021), with drone detection in military and security-related contexts (Chiper et al, 2022), or with specific drone applications, either military or civil (e.g., Roldán-Gómez et al, 2021), or for entertainment (Kim et al, 2018).…”
Section: Related Work On Traditional and Natural Interaction-based Dr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, now we have more friendly interfaces exploiting natural interactions and enhanced by improved self-stabilization drone mechanisms. Many recent works deal with drone communication protocols (Hassija et al, 2021), with drone detection in military and security-related contexts (Chiper et al, 2022), or with specific drone applications, either military or civil (e.g., Roldán-Gómez et al, 2021), or for entertainment (Kim et al, 2018).…”
Section: Related Work On Traditional and Natural Interaction-based Dr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the detection solutions relying on acoustic and visual sensing, both active and passive RF drone detection methods ensure higher robustness, achieving good results regardless of the environmental conditions [ 10 ]. The passive approaches, exploiting the physical layer protocols used by drones, analyze the RF spectrum to identify the uplink or downlink transmissions that occur between drones and their controller based on the well-known features of these links [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. The major drawback of passive RF methods is their limitation in detecting the UAVs that function in fully autonomous mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can identify three models (Parrot Bebop, Parrot AR, DJI Phantom), and for the Parrot model, it is able to identify the flight mode of the drone. The DronEnd system [ 10 ] is used to jam the RF of the drones. Yang et al [ 11 ] are able to detect drones with close to 100% accuracy at distances up to 2.4 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%