Drone methodologies: Taking flight in human and physical geography

Abstract

The world of late seems oversaturated with stories about drones. These suddenly pervasive machines straddle a divide in geography, being simultaneously an important tool for proximal sensing in physical geography and technology with military origins that human geographers have critically engaged. This paper, a collaboration between a physical and a human geographer, is an exploration of the epistemological nexus that a critical drone methodology offers the discipline, and which we suggest provides a new opportunity for collaborative human/physical geography. Drawing on our own research with drones and that of others, we demonstrate how recent scholarship on vertical geographies and longstanding remote-sensing frameworks are challenged by drone methodologies where social, environmental and technological concerns are entangled with the politics of access to proximal airspace and, in doing so, define a new conceptual atmospheric zone within the Earth's atmospheric boundary layerthe "Nephosphere"where drone experimentation occurs. We argue that engagement with non-military uses of drones is crucial for the discipline, now that we are entering an uncertain aerial future that will be replete with flying robots, and suggest drones are reconfiguring geographic imaginations. In short, we call on geographers to participate actively in the shaping of new drone methodologies where the values and perils of the technology can be critically debated from the starting point of the experiential, rather than the speculative. K E Y W O R D S aerial, drone, methodology, proximal sensing, remote sensing, vertical, visual

Nano and Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A New Grand Challenge for Precision Agriculture?

“…In recent years, numerous studies have reviewed the application of UAVs to a variety of fields, including ecology and plant ecophysiology (Gago et al., 2015; Garrett & Anderson, 2018; Pádua et al., 2017; Sankaran et al., 2015). In this article, we build on these previous efforts by reviewing the emergence of UAVs in the scientific literature and their agricultural applications, focusing particularly on the most recent advances and the obstacles that have prevented use of these technologies by farm managers and other non‐specialists.…”

“…This affordability and ease of use, both of which are expected to increase in the coming years (Garrett & Anderson, 2018), have led to extensive use of UAVs by the general public and have in turn prompted increased regulation and concern regarding UAV‐related threats to the safety of manned airspace, public health, and privacy (Nakamura & Kajikawa, 2018). In the USA and EU, for example, it is necessary to obtain a Remote Pilot Certificate to operate UAVs for non‐hobby use and other certificates in relationship to the aircraft and the operator, a factor that might hinder UAV uptake in agriculture.…”

“…Since the earliest studies of Herwitz and colleagues (Herwitz et al, 2002; Herwitz, Leung, Higgins, & Dunagan, 2002), the number of papers reporting UAV investigations or associated methodologies published annually in agriculture and plant sciences has increased exponentially, as research using this technology has expanded greatly in both quantity and scope (Anderson & Gaston, 2013; Gago et al., 2015; Garrett & Anderson, 2018). Since 2009, the number of papers describing UAV application to plant sciences has also grown exponentially, probably related to the general release of commercial civilian UAVs, such as DJI® or Mikrokopter®, both released in 2006.…”

Urban robotic experimentation: San Francisco, Tokyo and Dubai

“…There is growing interest amongst researchers, technologists and policy-makers in the reimagining and remaking of urban infrastructure and urban social life through advances in robotics and autonomous systems (Del Casino, 2016; Macrorie et al, 2019; Marvin et al, 2018b; Nagenborg, 2018; Royakkers and Van Est, 2015; Tiddi et al, 2019). This is most evident in burgeoning literature on drones, other unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and autonomous vehicles (AVs) (Bissell, 2018; Garrett and Anderson, 2017; Shaw, 2016). However there is a much wider potential application of social robotics in cities as robots replace or supplement tasks currently undertaken by humans, including in policing and security, the delivery of goods and food, maintenance and repair, construction, personal assistance and healthcare.…”

The population randomization observation process (PROP) assessment method: using systematic habitation observations of street segments to establish household-level epidemiologic population samples

“…Drones make for the dynamic real-time collection of detailed high-resolution data, which can include the collection of non-visual data (e.g., sound, air particulate matter, etc. ), but with the potential for drone data collection to be anonymous, issues of privacy are a major concern [7].…”