1950
DOI: 10.1021/ie50486a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drop Formation in Two-Liquid-Phase Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which was the average of the maximum drop size encountered at all flow rates except near the critical velocity region. On Figure 2, the predicted curve (solid line) may he compared with experimental curve (dotted line) to see the agreement and the applicability of Equation ( 7 ) . Further comparisons are made in Figure 7a and 7b for the average diameter, dav defined as…”
Section: The Rise Time Distribution Of Droplets In the Swarmmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which was the average of the maximum drop size encountered at all flow rates except near the critical velocity region. On Figure 2, the predicted curve (solid line) may he compared with experimental curve (dotted line) to see the agreement and the applicability of Equation ( 7 ) . Further comparisons are made in Figure 7a and 7b for the average diameter, dav defined as…”
Section: The Rise Time Distribution Of Droplets In the Swarmmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The dotted lines on Figure 2 show the distribution predicted by Equation (7). This theoretical result is based on a critical velocity of 23 cm./sec.…”
Section: The Rise Time Distribution Of Droplets In the Swarmmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Mashayek (1995) Hayworth & Treybal (1950) Kitamura et al (1986 Masutani & Experimental studies Goedde & Yuen (1970) Kowalewski (1996) Kumar & Hartland (1984 Adams (2000) Arai & Amagai (1999) Lin (2003) Skelland & Walker (1989) Das (1997 Tang et al (2002, Longmire et al ( 2001) Milosevic & Longmire (2002 2003) Table 1.1 Previous studies of cylindrical liquid jet instability. Figure 1.2 from Grant and Middleman (1966) shows the typical evolution of jet breakup length observed as jet discharge velocity is increased.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were conducted by Hayworth and Treybal (1950), Meister and Scheele (1969), Kitamura et al (1982), Kumar and Hartland (1984), Skelland and Walker (1989), Kato et al (2000), Longmire et al (2001) and others to study liquid-liquid jet breakup. These studies have provided useful data on droplet size and breakup length but were limited to laminar jet flow.…”
Section: Jet Instability Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowering of the interfacial tension in some systems may lead to finer dispersion of droplets, 13) stable emulsions, 14) and interfacial turbulence 15) and may also enhance the extraction rate. 16,17) Thus, study on the interfacial tension which is the most easily measured interfacial property of liquid-liquid systems has * Corresponding author E-mail: ohtok@cc.saga-u.ac.jp been required, because the kinetics of the metal extraction process depends upon the concentration of the reactant species at the reaction sites and it should supports to fundamentally understand the mechanism of metal extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%