Drop Retention Force as a Function of Drop Size

Abstract

The force, f, required to slide a drop past a surface is often considered in the literature as linear with the drop width, w, so that f/w = const. Furthermore, according to the Dussan equation for the case that the advancing and receding contact angles are constant with drop size, one can further simplify the above proportionality to f/V(1/3) = const where V is the drop volume. We show, however, that experimentally f/V(1/3) is usually a decaying function of V (rather than constant). The retention force increases with the time the drop rested on the surface prior to sliding. We show that this rested-time effect is similar for different drop sizes, and thus the change of f/V(1/3) with V occurs irrespective of the rested-time effect which suggests that the two effects are induced by different physical phenomena. The time effect is induced by the unsatisfied normal component of the Young equation which slowly deforms the surface with time, while the size effect is induced by time independent properties. According to the Dussan equation, the change of f/V(1/3) with V is also expressed in contact angle variation. Our results, however, show that contact angle variation that is within the scatter suffices to explain the significant force variation. Thus, it is easier to predict contact angle variation based on force variation rather than predicting force variation based on contact angle variation. A decrease of f/V(1/3) with V appears more common in the system studied compared to an increase.

Water tribology on graphene

“…The trend shown in Fig. 3a is valid for a variety of drop-solid systems studied so far 4,12,17,[21][22][23] .…”

Wetting phenomena on micro-grooved aluminum surfaces and modeling of the critical droplet size

“…Recent work has shown that the retention force may be a function of time so the ability to photograph the droplet in a quick and consistent manner is important [17]. According to Yadav et al [18], the error in the measured advancing and receding contact angles due to this droplet resting time would be less than ±0.4 • and 0.6 • , respectively, which is within the experimental uncertainty of this work. The camera was mounted opposite to a light source on an arm that could be rotated around a fixed plate containing the test surface and droplet.…”

Mixing and internal dynamics of droplets impacting and coalescing on a solid surface

“…[29]. A shadowgraph system was used to illuminate, from behind, sessile droplets resting on a substrate mounted on a rotational stage.…”